Date:         Sun, 5 Mar 2006 17:33:36 -0700
Reply-To:     Karl Wolz <wolzphoto@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Karl Wolz <wolzphoto@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
Subject:      Re: How long on the list? VLVC
Comments: To: Jim Felder <felder@KNOLOGY.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <ba1bf44955c53bfabe0bc7440ad03424@knology.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

I believe that Robert was referring to the "new" part rather than the
"album" part of the release.

Karl Wolz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On
Behalf Of
> Jim Felder
> Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 5:04 PM
> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> Subject: Re: How long on the list? VLVC
>
> >
> > albums... I still call peoples latest release.. "Their new Album" I
> > should
> > really stop that.
> >
>
> It still IS an album. People didn't start calling collections of
> digital photos something else just because the storage medium changed.
> When some post-neanderthal punk challenges us pre-neanderthals on
this,
> remind them that CD and Phonograph Record refer to the recording
media,
> and that an album will always be a either a themed collection or a
> collection by a single artist or group, no matter what form it's
> recorded or displayed in.
>
> RVC I skipped all that intermediate technology and went from cassette
> tape to iPod in my Vanagon, so what do I know.
>
> Jim