Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2006, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 3 Apr 2006 00:04:08 -0400
Reply-To:     Wesley Pegden <wes@CS.UCHICAGO.EDU>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Wesley Pegden <wes@CS.UCHICAGO.EDU>
Subject:      Re: mpg
Comments: To: Maggie Dew <wildebus@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <4387de760604021900k6294370ck119da789bb1edb67@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I've observed the same behavior that Maggie and others have reported, and have harbored what I'm sure will be an unpopular theory to explain it: rolling hills can be good for gas mileage. Although it may first be counterintuitive, I think it's quite possible that at some speeds, and for some grades of hills (depending on the engine and gear ratios) going up and then down hills can consume less gas than driving on a flat portion of equal length.

Before someone says that this is obviously impossible, consider this: If my goal was to maximize gas mileage over a 100 mile stretch (i.e., minimize gas usage to cover the 100 miles), I would not be at all surprised if my best bet was to climb a very steep hill for the first 10-20 miles, then shut off the engine (or let it idle) and coast down a shallower 80 mile hill, leaving me at my original altitude, probably at well over the normal 20 mpg.

It seems like something similar could be going on when we drive over more normal hills: the van sometimes gets better gas mileage by concentrating its work on the climb, then taking a break on the coast.

-Wes '89 1.9l. missing the hills.

Maggie Dew wrote: > Well, it's not just that the "grass is greener" - I have recorded every tank > of gas and every mile i've driven since I got the bus. I spent all summer > above 7,000 ft. for 2 years, and all winter in the Oklahoma flatlands for 2 > years, and the mpg is consistently higher in the mountains, although she > seems to be at lower power climbing the hills > > "From: Paul Connelly <vanagonhummingbird@GMAIL.COM> > Subject: Re: MPG > > I think its just a "grass is greener on the other side thing"! I live at > 9,100" and most of my driving is done at over that, and there is always lot= > s > of climbing, so when I get down to the plains, even over 5,000', my van > seems to have wings with all that "extra power". > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.