Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2006, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 2 Apr 2006 09:59:08 -0400
Reply-To:     Dennis Haynes <dhaynes@OPTONLINE.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Dennis Haynes <dhaynes@OPTONLINE.NET>
Subject:      Re: MPG Question
Comments: To: mark drillock <drillock@EARTHLINK.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <442FCF7D.1050201@earthlink.net>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

The 84 most likely has a much more optimistic speedometer than the 86 to the point that it appears to have a different ratio. There should be a stamp on the outside of the transmission. The DU came with 4.85. The ABD has a 4.83. The DK has a 4.57. I believe this was shortly used for the air cooled. The DM is 5.42 and the DZ was 5.86. These were Diesel boxes.

Dennis

-----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of mark drillock Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 9:20 AM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: MPG Question

Jake, what you wrote in your first post was simply wrong. Now you are misstating the exchange. I did not say that YOUR tranny didn't have a 4.57 because that is not what you said. You said the 1.9 gearboxes had 4.57 and the 2.1 gearboxes had 4.83 or 4.86. I replied that in North American models both the 1.9 and 2.1 trannys have essentially the same gearing and neither used a 4.57. I stand by that and so would any VW transmission rebuilding shop. You can look it up in the Vanagon Bentley as well. You don't have to rebuild the tranny to check the ratio. If it or the engine is out, simply unbolt the bell housing and pull it away. The ring gear with have the teeth count stamped right on it.

Mark

Jake de Villiers wrote:

>.............. > >One of my first posts on this lists was regarding the 4.57 R & P in my 84, >and Mr Drillock's reply was most emphatic- there is no such thing. I could >have said that I didn't want to call him a liar but, but I didn't. My 84 >has a much taller rear end ratio than my 86. That's a fact. I'm sure that >someday I'll pull the box and rebuild it, and then I'll send Mr Drillock a >photo that he might accept as proof. > > .................................


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.