If the enzyme technology works as hoped, then there is no additional 'production' of anything, at least until the integration process begins to hit critical mass due to demand- the ethanol is distilled from the cellulose in waste plant matter, of which there is far more grown each year than the foodstuffs that come off of it, nevermind non-farm/food sources. Seems to me, if you can distill Uncle Roy's Peace o' Mind in a solar still or a manure still, you could make ethanol in similar fashion. If the technology is efficient enough, then farms that are essentially non-productive outside of the growing/harvesting season could be making ethanol in the off-season, without any additional transportation resources required (fields are cleared, etc. anyway). The small farmer then also becomes the small refiner- he takes what he needs to run his farm and sells the rest, further integrating the cycle. Give it time, the whole thing could turn out to be very interesting. Remember, there are macro money interests that would like nothing better than to see the continued suppression of alternate energy sources, and that'll be difficult to overcome. Also, these studies tend to get outdated by technology advances. My chief concern, as I said before, is about the water- you're trying to manufacture a replacement for a scarce resource with another scarce resource, at least in many parts of the world. Cya, Robert ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Tipsword" <nobleman1962@YAHOO.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 9:32 PM Subject: Re: Gas price war / costs of road trips (NVC)
> More grist for the mill... > > http://zfacts.com/p/60.html > > http://healthandenergy.com/ethanol.htm > > http://www.cecarf.org/Programs/Fuels/SourcesCarriers.html > > It is my opinion that ethanol will do several things none of them very > good. > > People don't factor in how much petroleum it takes to produce corn or > sugar cane or whatever you intend on distilling. They also neglect to > factor in the energy required in the distillation process. Where is this > energy derived? Coal, NatGas or? No matter how you slice it the hidden > costs are numerous and they far outstrip the usefulness of this energy > carrier. > > > Lastly this is to provoke thought and friendly discourse, not spin anyone > up :-) > > Brian > > PS > The scarpar is very cool! |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.