Date:         Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:35:25 -0500
Reply-To:     Richard Green <rlgreen@INDUSTRYINET.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Richard Green <rlgreen@INDUSTRYINET.COM>
Subject:      Re: just the (car)fax Fair Use Law?
In-Reply-To:  <200604270024.AA147456190@mail.eworld3.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed

  The world has too many lawyers and too much time on their hands.. I am
trying to sell my house,the first reality company had a 7 page contract,
they never showed the house. They wanted to sell the big money stuff, so
I was close to a snakes belly,. the second reality company had a 1 page
contract.. She said we have been in business long time so know what we
need on a contract.
Has anyone read the whole contract on a credit card, house loan, bank
loan. Talk about legalese, you need a lawer to just tell you what all
means.
I am not sure where the "fair use law" applies to their report. It is a
federal law covering the use of copyright work, books, magazines,
movie's, TV ads . It allows people to use or Quote someones work. I ran
into this while doing computer work at a college and the library. The
software was on their website and you could order the information and
retrieve it off the web site they had to send you a email your user Idea
and password and the link to where your doc is.
Does this apply to car fax reports? I am sure it does, but how much. Go
to a theme park, the ticket says something like "Your purchasing of this
Ticket, relives’ us from all claims .....!@##&&&* . Say Ahem. Well it
does not take your rights to sue them for a lot of things. It is more BS
trying to scam the public.
Let then charge $2.00 for a report. 10 for $15.and anything greater
would be a commercial account land need to be verified. Plus anything
that would make sense.They have been showing then on eBay, now they seem
to be using a different company. Not being able to show anyone a carfax
is just stupid. I guess thats why they have completion now.

Richard

Evan Martin wrote:
> Well said, Jeff. That's what I was trying to get at. And sorry, the redistribution clause does begin with the word Commercial. I wasn't reading as carefuly.
>
> plus I kind of like to argue moot points once in awhile.
>
> Evan
>
> emartin@eworld3.net
> Evan C.Martin
> Minneapolis, MN
> 55414
>
> 612.685.5953
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Sent via the WebMail system at mail.eworld3.net
>
>
>


--

Richard & Joyce Green

Problem Peke Fosters & Dog Rehabilitators

Senior Small Dog Forever Home

New Ulm, Tx

alternate email address that we can get anywhere.

tx_small_dog_fosters@yahoo.com

As you slide down the banister of life, may the splinters never point in the wrong direction.

All your lightning waits inside you...