Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2006, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:49:40 -0400
Reply-To:     Kenneth Wilford <kenwilfy@COMCAST.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Kenneth Wilford <kenwilfy@COMCAST.NET>
Subject:      Trans. Braking or breaking (same thing)
Comments: To: Neal Barrentine <vwneal@BLUEMARBLE.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <c17bf63d4e34a3856d9b3ab0fc66c186@bluemarble.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

If I were going down a long winding grade I would shift down and let the transmission and engine slow down the vehicle just because if you use your brakes all the way when you get to the bottom you may not have them anymore. However beside that I use my foot to slow or stop the Van. Brakes are very easy and cheap to replace. Usually they last more than 50k miles on a Vanagon. Braking using the transmission (downshifting) puts wear and tear on the clutch system and the transmission. Last time I checked neither of these was cheap to fix or easy to get to. So you can down shift when approaching every red light and you can make your brakes last longer. You just saved $100 in pads and shoes. Or you can use the brakes and save over a thousand dollars worth of transmission and clutch. Which makes more sense?

Thanks, Ken Wilford John 3:16 http://www.vanagain.com http://www.strictlyvwauctions.com http://www.eurovan.org http://www.vwcabrio.org Phone: (856)-327-4936 Fax: (856)-327-2242

-----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of Neal Barrentine Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 10:40 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: vanagon Digest - 25 Apr 2006 to 26 Apr 2006 - Special issue (#2006-359)

> A manual transmission > automobile can use the engine for slowing down much more effectively > than an automatic can.

The cost of the energy lost due to braking, and the money spent on maintaining brakes is a lot less than the wear on the engine, transmission and clutch after using them as brakes. Neal Barrentine Bloomington, Indiana 1986 GL 1960 Baja Bug

On Apr 26, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Automatic digest processor wrote:

> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:26:27 -0400 > From: Kim Brennan <kimbrennan@MAC.COM> > Subject: Re: More Energy Saving (driving) > > Essential the philosophy promoted in the John Muir book "How to Keep > your Volkswagen Alive". Think of brakes negatively. Use them > sparingly. > > My father is an adherent of that philosophy. He'd often get 100K miles

> out of his brakes before they needed to be worked on. Mechanics never > could understand how he did it. A manual transmission automobile can > use the engine for slowing down much more effectively than an > automatic can.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.