Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2006, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:28:20 -0400
Reply-To:     Jonathan Farrugia <jfarrugi@UMICH.EDU>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jonathan Farrugia <jfarrugi@UMICH.EDU>
Subject:      Re: private vs public
Comments: To: monte merrick <montemerrick@SPEAKEASY.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <dd3558b27c2c2375e137439339f1e5ad@speakeasy.net>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

many feel the general rules of Netiquette are that personal messages should not be forwarded to lists as they are private messages not meant for public consumption.

often times i feel that people that intentionally send private emails to public lists have an axe to grind. i think the only widely accepted exception to this "rule" is posting email replies from companies as most companies are going to join the list to offer their input.

jonathan

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, monte merrick wrote:

> dear listees > > mr keezer has requested that i apologize to the list for posting > private email from him to me. > > if that was a violation of the list protocol than i am now corrected > and will do not do so in the future. this howevver is not an apology. > based on no more information about me than a link i posted on the list > to hempcar.org regarding rudolf diesel and biodiesel, and another post > in which i suggested that biodiesel is not as benign as is suggested > due to the potential for animal based fuels, he has attacked me and his > idea of what my religion must be, and has done so privately without my > invitation. he claims we were having a discussion. i disagree. i > believe that at first i was trying with a light hand to sterr him back > to the forum and then with a much less light hand letting him know that > he was violating my privacy. > > and that's where i stand. i am willing to share my communications with > mr. keezer with this forum. he apparently is not willing to share his. > > certainly i recognize that we all privately email one another when an > issue does not concern the entire list - or when a personal aside is > called for. in no way do i mean to interfere with ordinary human > communication. > > thanks you and i am sorry for any wasted time or bandwidth this issue > has caused. > > > monte merrick > wildlife rehabilitator/oiled bird care specialist > seattle washington > montemerrick@speakeasy.net > > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.