Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2006, week 5)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 31 May 2006 16:15:50 -0700
Reply-To:     John Bange <jbange@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         John Bange <jbange@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: OT: Who needs a Ford when they have a Syncro
In-Reply-To:  <6.2.1.2.2.20060531172646.021a6810@mail.bostig.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 5/31/06, Bostig Eng. <syncrolist@bostig.com> wrote: > > I disagree, and it has nothing to do with me putting ford engines into > syncros either! But since it isn't the engineering that caused the ford > 4x4 van to come apart, you can't realistically praise VW engineers for the > syncros not doing so. Ford doesn't make any factory 4x4 vans, they are > retrofits by quigley and century if memory serves in the aftermarket, and > then sold back through ford dealer channels as Ford 4x4s... so keep that > in > mind...

Oh certainly! Note I made no particular comments about Ford itself. The meat of my observation was aimed at the apparent fact that paying $95K for a hand-assembled, custom made 4x4 rig is no guarantee it's not going to go to pieces. I have no doubt the Ford van itself is perfectly sound, but judging by my brother's trials and tribulations with his lifted Nissan pickup, an uncomfortably large portion of custom aftermarket "engineering" consists of two guys welding up a prototype and driving around with the part on their vehicle for a while to see if it holds up. Century and Quigley customs are probably a bit less "seat of the pants" in the design & engineering departments than the wiener dudes my brother had hop up his truck, but they're certainly not AM General or Textron. I seriously doubt they have anything on Steyr/Puch!

not to mention that things coming loose has very little to do with > engineering in the real world... you can't engineer a failsafe method for > making installers use threadlocker etc and a torque wrench.

I'll grant you that it looks like the guy fixing the front end is searching for replacement fasteners for ones that probably rattled loose, but given the way the spare tire carrier off the rear is sagging, and its apparent absence in subsequent photos, I'd have to call that one for the "bad engineering" column for "bent due to insufficient engineering"..

I think there > is far more to scratch heads about when it comes to VAG engineering than > outright praise. Firesuit on.

No argument there. I would definitely limit my praise specifically to the 4WD Syncro, and even then with a blind eye to certain unfortunate decisions...

-- John Bange '90 Vanagon - "Geldsauger"


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.