Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2006, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:13:23 -0400
Reply-To:     Mike Bucchino <mbucchino@CHARTER.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Mike Bucchino <mbucchino@CHARTER.NET>
Subject:      Fw: Re: ? for our mechanical wizards
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
              reply-type=response

----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Bucchino" <mbucchino@charter.net> To: "Henry Luhrs" <Henry.Luhrs@BRUKER-BIOSPIN.COM> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 4:08 PM Subject: Re: Re: ? for our mechanical wizards

> Assuming 100% volumetric efficiency, which no naturally-aspirated engine > can have........... > > Mike B. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Henry Luhrs" <Henry.Luhrs@BRUKER-BIOSPIN.COM> > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 3:46 PM > Subject: Re: ? for our mechanical wizards > > >> Hi John, >> Well, 2.1 Liters is 0.0742 cu/ft. At 5000 RPM you would draw that >> volume 2,500 >> times a minute, so that would make about 185 cu. ft./minute. Each >> cylinder would be a >> quarter of that (about 46 cu. ft./min). Improved vaporization of fuel is >> what fuel injection does. >> Direct injection does it a bit better, but those are pretty recent. I >> would guess that putting in >> new injectors might help a little bit, but not more than 5 - 10% unless >> your injectors are really >> bad. >> >> Henry >> >> >> On 23 Jun 2006 at 13:56, John Rodgers wrote: >> >>> Can anyone tell me what the flow rate of intake air - cubic feet per >>> minute - is on the WBX 2.1 L engine ...and.... for one cylinder .... say >>> at top rpm and/or horsepower? >>> >>> Also, what is the cylinder volume of air taken into the engine on a >>> single intake stroke? >>> >>> And finally - anyone have any opinions on this concept......"Improved >>> vaporization of fuel will improve gas mileage!" >>> >>> Inquiring minds (probably more like demented minds) want to know. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> John Rodgers >>> 88 GL Driver >>> >> >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.