Date:         Sat, 24 Jun 2006 08:48:08 -0700
Reply-To:     John Bange <jbange@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         John Bange <jbange@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Fw: Re: ? for our mechanical wizards
Comments: To: David Beierl <dbeierl@attglobal.net>
In-Reply-To:  <6.2.3.4.2.20060624033252.07960810@pop1.attglobal.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

>
> Running closed-loop it will move very close to 14.7 pounds of air for
> every pound of fuel consumed...that oughta get you there, nu?


Heh. Yeah, good call. I think that'd be a pretty accurate guess. A little
less air on WOT enrichment and a little more air on deceleration fuel
cutoff, but I bet it never strays far from stoichiometric overall.

--
John Bange
'90 Vanagon - "Geldsauger"

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!

Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com

The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.