Date:         Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:00:28 -0400
Reply-To:     dhaynes@OPTONLINE.NET
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Dennis Haynes <dhaynes@OPTONLINE.NET>
Subject:      Re: AC Receiver Drier 253260633"D" vs 253260633"E"
Comments: To: Christopher Gronski <gronski@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <11dcddf80606281033t55b0438fxabd27a4101aecb19@mail.gmail.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Use the same as you have. The facory hose will not reach the other style.

Dennis

----- Original Message -----
From: Christopher Gronski <gronski@GMAIL.COM>
Date: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 1:33 pm
Subject: AC Receiver Drier 253260633"D" vs 253260633"E"

> I had a SD510 compressor in my van, but I'm replacing it with a SD709
> as per Bentley 87.16. The SD510 compressor is mated to the 25326063
> "D" Receiver Drier:
>
> http://www.vanagain.com/images/S_253260633d.jpg
>
>
> So when I'm replacing it do I use the "D" again (which is recommended
> for the SD510), or now that I am dropping in a SD709 do I use the
> 25326063 "E" (which is recommended for the SD709):
>
> http://www.vanagain.com/images/253260633e.jpg
>
> The outward difference appears to be the slight offset of the "D" from
> center, but the line to it is flexible so I'm sure it would reach. The
> "D" costs more than double what the "E" does. What do dryers do
> anyway? Is it a capacity issue or a fitment issue?
>
> Any thoughts?
> Chris
>