My comparison is one to one, the stock 212 (?) to a 9 LED direct replacement, exactly 10 to 1 on current draw. The interesting technology is the *Cold Cathode Fluorescents**, some specs here:* http://www.cetsolar.com/ccfspec.htm But look to be a pricey solution. On 6/28/06, Ed <eduntz@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure we're comparing the same things. If you look at lumens per > watt, compact fluorescents are the most efficient, then LEDs, then > incandescents. Both LEDs and fluorescents are more efficient than the stock > incandescents. LEDs draw much less power than either in an equivalent size, > but it's hard to get as much light output from LEDs. Many replacements for > the 211 and 212 bulbs actually have several- maybe six or nine- LEDs in the > housing. > > > |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.