Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2006, week 5)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:46:49 -0700
Reply-To:     Steve Williams <steve@CELINEANDSTEVE.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Steve Williams <steve@CELINEANDSTEVE.COM>
Subject:      Re: AMC heads (part 2)
Comments: To: benoit <huotb@VIDEOTRON.CA>
In-Reply-To:  <454816FA.7060405@videotron.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Nope, you aren't the only ones reading all of this!

I learned lapping valves on old Briggs & Stratton lawn mower engines from my old man when I was pre-teen!

I knew the technique & the goal, but none of the reasoning. Very interesting. Strangely enough, he was an aircraft mechanic as well!

Thanks for the great info!

Cheers, Steve Williams

benoit wrote: > John, very very interesting post, thanks for all that very well written > information! > > The only thing i have to say about airplane VS cars (i'm also trained as > an airplane mechanic (never really work in it!), and on top, i have > another 3 years in airplane fabrication). That said, just so you know, > early pancake (1700, 1800) engine had sodium EX valves, being to > expensive, they where simply lost with time... in those cheap rebuilt! i > have in the shop a brand new OEM 1700cc heads (found this one in a scrap > Bus???) with those valves! this head is now on a shelf as a collection > item!! :-))) > > The 1700 and the very good 1800cc pancake were, i think, the most > reliable and strong engine in the boxer line... sadly, the 2000 that > followed was not that strong, any well in shape big valves NON > hydro-lifter 1800 equiped with a good set of dual carb would beat any > other generation of VW boxer engine, including a 2.1L... the 2000 > suffer from improper Hydro-lifter (i hate those) system, yes, it work > great for any normal consumer (no valve adjustment) but they loose power > just for that reason, also, many 2.0L or Vanagon engine have bad valve > adjustment! the lifter is there to to compensate some play, but not if > your way out of the recommended adjustment! you should see some engines > i see, 4 turns IN, 006 gap out.... bent pushrods, broken lifter, damage > cam.... no wonder we see all those broken valves, damage heads, > pistons, rings... Valve gap/opening is EVERYTHING to an engine working > properly!!!! > > Anyway, i don't want to bored anyone with my experiences! > > To your questions (not that i need to answer it since you know better > than me!!! :-))))) > > ----------------- > Ben, a question(1) > > Can one take those valve stem retainer halves and simply grind them down > on a surface plate with 400-600 grit wet/dry paper and take off enough > to get them to fit with the tiny gap-o-sis that is needed?? > ----------------- > That is what i did! BUT, like Dennis told me this morning: > *****Properly fitted, the valve keepers should allow the valve to > rotate. The rockers are offset to provide rotation action. Of course, I > often wonder if they do but that is the plan. ****** > > Well, Dennis is right! BUT, here we have 2 problems, well, the first > being that the AMC keeper are to big and we can see the damage, and the > second is that we can easily grind to much the keeper so they will be to > small!!! It is almost impossible for the human eye to grind those to > perfection... and what is perfection! Rotation of the valve is as good > as rotation of the pistons rings! rings should be place is a certain > patern and stay like that... and NOT move form that position (VW said > 180deg to each other), some good mechanic will put them 120deg from each > other... who care, i did that on many engine, not to say all, but i had > to re-open an engine that had the ring at the 180deg position, they were > all mix up after 20k... i should have known better! anyway, now, i don't > care about ring position! i just care that they have the right gap.... > > where was I ????? a non rotating valve would result in what?? an oval > shape big end? maybe a burned valve, a damage seat!! we can live with > that, but a valve falling into the cylinder....... NO one can live with > that... so for me know, AMC keeper are going IN to tight! well, maybe > just ok because i have good eyes.... he he he... but german OEM EX valve > are the solution... and i have an hand-lapped tool! i will put pictures > of the 3 different hand-lap tool that i have... one is perfect for the > VW head. > > ---------------------- > Question (2) > Do you know what metal is used for the valve guides in todays > engines.Aircraft engines use to use bronze guides. That may have changed > by now. Curious to know about modern auto engines. > -------------------- > Nop, aks Bob Donald, he should know... but they are not bronze... and, > they are NOT the problem, they are hard enough, the AMC valve look if it > was made out of scrap metal... proof! : today i had fun for a few > minutes, i put one hold AMC valve and one hold VW valve in a vise, i > banged them with a hammer as hard as i could! well, what new, i had the > hardest time to bent the VW one, you wanna see the AMC...... > > I'm sure that we are the only one reading all that stuff!!! he he he, > but it was fun, tanks for sharring your knowledge John! > > Best regards, Ben > Doing THAT today! > http://www.benplace.com/paul.htm > (it's not a joke, i'm oppening engine like any would open a soup can > each day!) > > > John Rodgers wrote: > >> Ben, >> >> Interesting stuff on your website. >> >> Before I get into this, let me say I AM NOT by any means an auto >> mechanic, not even close. So what I have to say may not even be quite >> right or even have application to an automotive engine. Guys (and >> gals) who work them all the time know what is what. >> >> I come from that aircraft mechanic perspective. I was taught on piston >> aircraft engines the critical nature of valve specs to the engine, >> it's operation and longevity. In that training we were taught that the >> intake valve was cold, the exhaust valve was hot, and that told the >> tale. Exhaust valves suffered a lot from the heat of combustion, >> because they didn't have the benefit of the cooling of the fuel-air >> charge coming in past it for combustion as with the intake valve, but >> the exhaust valve got the full brunt of the heat of the burnt fuel >> going out of the cylinders. Thus it was that often exhaust valves >> stems were sodium filled to help transfer some of the heat up the stem >> to the oil circulating around the cylinder top. The sodium would get >> hot, liquify, and slop back and forth in the valve stem first toward >> the valve face, then to stem end, each time transporting heat from the >> face to the stem end protruding into the circulating oil system. >> Crucial to the life of a valve was the alloy. It has to be tough, >> hard, and capable of transferring the heat. Also, such was the case >> for the valve seats to take the hammering they get under extreme >> conditions. >> >> On the aircraft engines, it was also crucial that the valve face and >> seat be ground to mate properly. "Properly" for an aircraft engine >> was a valve face ground with three different facet angles on it, and >> if I recall, the valve seat was similar. The real trick was to hand >> "lap" the seating surface of the valve face to the seat. Very fine >> grinding compound in a moderate lubricant was applied lightly to the >> valve face, and then with the head at the right angle so the valve >> stem would be vertical to the floor, a tool was used to rotate the >> valve back and fourth 90-180 degrees. The valve was then lifted, >> rotated 90 degrees, then set back in place, and oscillated back and >> fourth again. This was continued until there was a continuous, >> non-metallic-glistening lapped circle of the ground surface on the >> valve face and on the valve seat. The "lap-line" was specified to be >> approx 1/8 inch wide, and located in the center of the center third >> of the ground valve face. . The final test of the proper seat was to >> remove the valve, wash of all grit, re-insert the valve in to the >> valve guide - with out benefit of springs to seat the valve, The >> weight of gravity provided the force of the seal between valve and >> valve seat. The cylinder was then filled with gasoline. If the gas did >> not leak, then the work passed the test. If the gas leaked, woe be >> unto us - we got our fannies kicked., an "F" for our grade, plus the >> luxury of doing a re-grind to get it right. >> >> I don't know if auto shops go to this much trouble for car engines. >> For an airplane, you had to have it right. It's a bit difficult to >> park on a cloud when there is a malfunction. But I think if auto work >> was done with such attention to detail, a lot of our V-gon problems >> would disappear. To me, a proper valve job would include hand-lapped >> valve seats. It would involve also a check to ensure no variation in >> the length of the valves - even new valves. >> >> Ben, a question(1) >> >> Can one take those valve stem retainer halves and simply grind them >> down on a surface plate with 400-600 grit wet/dry paper and take off >> enough to get them to fit with the tiny gap-o-sis that is needed?? >> >> Question (2) >> Do you know what metal is used for the valve guides in todays >> engines.Aircraft engines use to use bronze guides. That may have >> changed by now. Curious to know about modern auto engines. >> >> Regards, >> >> John Rodgers >> 88 GL Driver >> Chelsea, AL >> >> Benny boy wrote: >> >>> So lately i have worked on some engines with somewhat old AMC >>> heads... so of >>> course, i have seen other scary stuff... after some e-mail exchange >>> with Bob >>> Donald about those problems... i have uploaded my page to show you >>> how bad >>> AMC valve are... or can be, because it's not always the case, that is >>> the >>> real main problem! >>> >>> http://www.benplace.com/amc.htm >>> >>> Cheers, Benny boy (working like a dog) >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.