I don't think so Greg. Its a four-cycle engine: suck, squeeze, bang, blow takes two revolutions, not to mention pumping losses, valve deposits, air filters and such. On 11/4/06, Greg Potts <greg@pottsfamily.ca> wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > CFM to RPM is easy... a 2.1L engine pulls 2.1L of air per RPM. > > One liter = 0.0353146667 cubic feet. So a 2.1L engine at 1000 RPM > pulls 74.1608 CFM > > > Happy Trails, > > Greg Potts > 1973/74/75/77/79 Westfakia "Bob the Tomato" > www.pottsfamily.ca/westfakia > www.busesofthecorn.com > > On 4-Nov-06, at 2:06 PM, Mike Bucchino wrote: > > > You could bolt an AFM to a flowbench and run tests to determine these > > voltage changes for a given CFM, but you'd need to know how CFM > > equates to > > the engine's rpm, >
-- Jake 1984 Vanagon GL 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" www.crescentbeachguitar.com |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.