Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2006, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 7 Nov 2006 00:16:27 -0500
Reply-To:     neil <goofymuso@YAHOO.CA>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         neil <goofymuso@YAHOO.CA>
Subject:      Re: Learned something today.... (wheel studs)
Comments: To: Mark Drillock <drillock@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To:  <454FE9B7.9030608@earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

No worries. :)

It makes sense that over the years, there would be a possibility of several manufactures supplying this part to CPI.

Cheers,

Neil.

--- Mark Drillock <drillock@earthlink.net> wrote:

> Sorry to hear that. I have successfully used the > longer rear Empi studs > by that same part number several times. I still have > some sets in the > original packages. Mine all say a different country > of origin though and > were bought a couple years ago. I just took one out > and measured the > diameter of the splines in comparison with a stock > stud. Slightly LARGER > than stock, as I remembered. I always needed to > grind a slight taper > into the splines to get them in. I better check my > local store and see > if they have any of the old ones left. > > Mark > > neil wrote: > > > ..... buy the part from VW (or other reputable > vendor) > > > > Bought "EMPI 70-2810-0 WHL STUD, SET OF 5 CHINA" > wheel > > studs from CPI. > > > > (not slagging CPI. Did so knowing they may not > work). > > > > I knew they would be too long, but didn't know > that > > splined part would be a *hair* too small in diam. > and > > would rotate in hole in hub. I quickly measured at > > store with calipers and they seemed the same. They > > aren't. (I checked two of them just now. orig: > 14.7mm > > EMPI: 14.6mm) They fit tightish initially, but > after a > > small amount of torque, they turned. Also the head > of > > the stud is thinner (by half roughly) than orig. > > Likely not an issue, but figured the orig. design > was > > done so for a reason. i.e. a Vanagon wheighs more > > although I might be off base on that one. > > > > So for those who want to save a a few, don't > bother > > gambling on buys for something like wheel studs. > It's > > not worth it. Sure they might work, but even > ignoring > > the fact that the head is half as thick, the fact > that > > the studs might turn while trying to tighten them > > makes them a PITA at the very least. > > > > And yes I know I was warned. --- ;^) > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Neil Nicholson. > > 1981 Air Cooled Westfalia. > > > > http://web.mac.com/tubaneil > > > > _ >

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.