Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2006, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:27:12 -0800
Reply-To:     Nathaniel Poole <npoole@TELUS.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Nathaniel Poole <npoole@TELUS.NET>
Subject:      Re: [T2] economical cruising
In-Reply-To:  <a06100506c17ea2a4b494@[219.88.38.81]>
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

When they do MPG world records they do something similar - accelerate to a top speed, shut down the engine, coast almost to a stop, start it up again, do it all over again. Incredible MPG, but not too practical.

On 11/13/06 2:55 PM, "Robt Mann" <robtm@xtra.co.nz> wrote:

> A given cruising speed - say, 65 mph - uses considerably > less fuel if approached 'from above': float down onto that speed > gently from a slightly higher speed, rather than the more 'natural' > method of climbing up onto it from below. > > I used this method to good effect in driving home about 200 > mi on my Renault 1108cc with no muffler (from a town where no spare > muffler could be found). The muffler had become almost completely > detached at its entrance, leaving essentially a 9" pipe from the > exhaust manifold and little else, so it sounded like a machine gun. > To get thru small towns I would enter at about 60 with the motor > idling in neutral, and with any luck cruise out the far end at about > 20. On the highway I found that if I approached 65 mph from below > and drove steadily at that speed the machine-gun sound was very loud > and likely to attract police attention, whereas if I got up to 70 and > then floated down gently onto 65 it was scarcely louder than when the > muffler had been connected. We can safely assume less fuel was > being consumed in this cruise mode. > This apparently reflects some deficiency in typical carbs. > > (I can't comment on FI except that my wife's diesel (2L > uncharged Nissan) sounds considerably quieter when cruised this way, > and attains 53 mpg.) > > R > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > To UNSUBSCRIBE send any e-mail to: type2-unsubscribe@type2.com > To email the admin for list help only: type2-admin@type2.com > For additional commands send any e-mail to: type2-help@type2.com > Donations help keep the list going. http://www.type2.com/donate.html > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.