Date:         Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:36:37 -0500
Reply-To:     "Dr.Chris" <gronski@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         "Dr.Chris" <gronski@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Fwd: Your made a mistake! No discussions of your daily spam
              please
Comments: To: Sam Walters <sam.cooks@verizon.net>
Comments: cc: Syncro <Syncro@yahoogroups.com>, Syncro-owner@yahoogroups.com
In-Reply-To:  <45622BE8.80504@verizon.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hello All,

If my "you made a mistake" postinghas offended anyone please accept my
apology. I have been a list member of both the sycnro and vanagon
lists for six years now so I hope you will be able to indulge me on
this one.

For those on the Vanagon list, you may recall an automated "out of
office" message from John Wallace a year or so ago which became a
topic of discussion. Imdeed, if you check the archives I believ it was
me that first indicated John was AWOL.

I believe this "you made a mistake" is a similar message, an automated
one sent by someone who has subscribed to the syncro list (it does NOT
appear on the regular Vanagon list) but who's e-mail address has died
fro some reason. Now that I've narrowed it down I hope to get in touch
with the syncro list moderator to get things fixed up.

Rest assured I will not forward e-mails to the list about size
increasing wonder drugs, etc. For those who question its relevance
this e-mail, and the original one  was list related, in that it
pertained directy to list membership and its administration.

Sorry for any inconvenience,
Chris

On 11/20/06, Sam Walters <sam.cooks@verizon.net> wrote:
> Please, let's not start having lots of email traffic about who is
> getting what spam messages.  I have gotten that one and it is a typical
> spam message like ones that my spam filters pick up a dozen or more
> times a day.
>
> Who wants our vanagon lists to degenerate into "who got what" spam
> discussions?
>
> I doubt many of you will do this, and I hesitated before putting this
> into the email, but maybe this will prevent lots of replies.
>
> This is very different from John Rodgers asking for emergency help about
> his urgent computer needs.  To me, John's problem is OK because of its
> seriousness.  (And I wish that only people who really knew what they
> were talking about would reply as now people like Sudhir are having to
> correct erroneous advice.)
>
> Sam
>
> --
> Sam Walters
>
> Baltimore, MD
>
>
>