Date:         Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:47:37 -0800
Reply-To:     Steven Johnson <sjohnso2000@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Steven Johnson <sjohnso2000@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: co/propane/propex
In-Reply-To:  <200611292332.kATNWcng018375@ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Umm.... Well, I haven't removed mine and don't
plan too.  But if you want to install a Propex
heater under the seat, it's an option to preserve
extra space if you don't really need that extra
heater.  I personnally would not remove it as
ya never know when you might need it.  And there
have been times when I'm glad it's there.

Brrrrr!!!!!!

--- Jamie Auch <jamie@KOOKYMATHTEACHER.COM> wrote:

> I've been following this thread closely.  Why is
> everyone taking out the OEM heater in the rear?
>
> Jamie Auch
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Stevens [mailto:mtbiker62@HOTMAIL.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 10:30 AM
> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
> Subject: Re: co/propane/propex
>
> "The only thing I can see that is of benefit is the
> shorter copper tubing route to the main tube."
>
> .... unless you install another propane tank under
> the sliding door. I'm in the process of doing that
> now and have also removed the
> OEM heater under the bench. And, I'm not using
> copper tubing, rather the rubber hose commonly used
> now.
>
> Bob Stevens
> '87 Westy Syncro
> "Passion Fruit"
>





____________________________________________________________________________________
Cheap talk?
Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
http://voice.yahoo.com