VANAGON archives -- January 2007, week 1 (#318)

Date:         Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:55:21 -0600
Reply-To:     Jim Felder <felder@KNOLOGY.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jim Felder <felder@KNOLOGY.NET>
Subject:      Re: 84 clutch, etal
In-Reply-To:  <a06020400c1c44acf633f@[192.168.102.101]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed

I never thought about it, never having pulled the engine in anything
but my diesel, but I like the sound of that. You wouldn't even have
to readjust anything in the shift linkage, just lay it aside, right?

Jim

On Jan 5, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Paul Guzyk wrote:

> Dennis is correct...way easier to pull the tranny than the engine to
> replace a Vanagon clutch...and no need to mess with that pesky
> waterboxer cooling system....
>
>> On a Vanagon, a knowledgeable mechanic does not pull the engine to
>> service the clutch.
>> Dennis
>

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!

Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com

The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.