Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2007, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 21 Jan 2007 11:36:46 -0500
Reply-To:     Dennis Haynes <dhaynes@OPTONLINE.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Dennis Haynes <dhaynes@OPTONLINE.NET>
Subject:      Re: conversion -Opinions Please
Comments: To: Rob <becida@COMCAST.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <vanagon%2007012016444110@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On the Fun Bus, I had to replace the valve covers last year. They rusted out and the pin holes started leaking oil. The last time the valve covers were off was back in 1989 when VW did that re-torque the heads recall campaign. Now has 247,000 miles on it. I just did a NY to Florida trip last thanksgiving. Of course my other '87 did need head gaskets at 127k. Head corrosion did them. Road salt. One head was corroded so bad an exhaust stud fell out. Head done with engine in van. Worst part was the exhaust system. I know of many vans that have gone over 200k on the original engine. Definitely do-able.

Dennis

-----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of Rob Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 4:43 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: conversion -Opinions Please

At 1/20/2007 01:09 PM, Dave Vickery wrote:

>Conversions are justified if you want more power, not reliability. The >engine might be more reliable but the conversion and related things will >have you tinkering on it every weekend (really) and I wonder now whether I >like working on my van more than going places.

I have to disagree with this statement based on my experience. 18,805 miles (plus, my speedo didn't work for almost a month) on my Subaru 2.2 conversion. The engine had 130,000 on it when I put it in. I had to change the head gaskets on the Subaru engine, I should have done that when I was putting it but I didn't. That works out to one weekend working on the engine since last May (8 months) and I did that with the engine in the van. That's a touch better reliability than I had with the 2.1 that came with it <g>. FWIW my '87 Vanagon drives like real car merging on to the freeway now, even merging up a hill.

Rob becida@comcast.net

With a '91 Subaru 2.2 in an '87 Vanagon in western Washington.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.