Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2007, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:24:35 -0500
Reply-To:     Geza Polony <gezapolony@SBCGLOBAL.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Geza Polony <gezapolony@SBCGLOBAL.NET>
Subject:      Re: Oil is Killing our Cars?

It strikes me that there's a certain amount of mythology involved in oil selection. The British car enthusiasts who wrote the original article seemed to be faithful, by coincidence, to a British brand of oil, as though there's some affinity between car and oil because of their common national origin. It's half science, half myth. For the same reason you don't want to be served by a blond waitress in a Chinese restaurant, even if it's the same food, you don't want to run Dutch Shell in your English MG. They don't even speak the same language; how do you expect them to get along in there?

According to a mechanic friend, Porsche 356 owners have to run Redline, whereas VW owners swear by M1. Who knows why. People on the Saab board go for M1 or, sometimes, Royal Purple. But how much evidence do we really have? There's a lot of hearsay, a lot of anecdote. The science is almost always performed by the oil companies themselves, and since it isn't a food product, there's no FDA to confirm or deny it.

After 35 years of car ownership, I couldn't demonstrate convincingly that there's any difference whatsoever between oils, other than that the viscosity makes a slight difference in the way the car idles. Before I was married, my wife ran a Toyota pickup for over 110,000 miles without an oil change (or anything else) and it still runs like a champ at almost 180K. (Then again, it's a Toyota.) With all due respect, my feeling is that a lot of oil analysis and evaluation is Madison-Ave. mythmaking. Mobil is the #1 brand in synthetics because of Mobil's massive marketing campaign more than a decade ago. Could anyone really demonstrate that it's "better" than Quaker State or whatever in terms of engine longevity? Even if you take apart an engine and find sludge in there, did the sludge really cause the engine to fail? Where's the science?

I think I'm going to get some of that Slick 50, which lubricates so well you can run your engine WITHOUT OIL! Dang! Really, I saw it on TV!

Now Bar's Leak, that stuff works.

Not?


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.