Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 2007, week 5)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:35:28 -0400
Reply-To:     Dennis <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
Comments:     RFC822 error: <W> MESSAGE-ID field duplicated. Last occurrence
              was retained.
From:         Dennis <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Thermostat ???
Comments: To: Ccsvanagon@WMCONNECT.COM
In-Reply-To:  <c18.f17e8e3.3340220d@wmconnect.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

So, after 7 years you are now concerned? Not using a thermostat on any water cooled car is stupid. It is especially bad for most VW-Audi products as a missing thermostat actually reduces cooling capacity. That is due to the fact that the t-stat is really a mixing valve. As the thermostat opens to allow cool water from the radiator to flow, it also closes a bypass that re-circulates the coolant within the engine to keeps temperatures the same everywhere. Not only is a cool running engine bad for condensation and carbon build up problems, but since the temperature is regularly varying as load and speed changes, everything is getting a workout from constant expansion and contraction.

Dennis

-----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of Chris Snyder Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 4:44 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Thermistat ???

Hello all fellow list members!

OK, I am asking a question I have been toying with every since I bought the Van about 7 years ago. My mechanic which is the same person I bought my 1987 Wolfburg edition from has always run my Van without any thermostat in the cooling system. He says that A. It is better for the head gaskets, hoses etc. (Hoses replaced a year ago. And B. As hot as it gets here it's is better for the engine to not use the thermostat and C. with the mild winters we have the heat that is produced from the heaters is sufficient.

I am afraid that without the engine not warming up to normal temp it will get a build up of carbon etc.

It hasn't seemed to be hurting the engine as it purrs along and has been for about 7 years without the thermostat. Opinions, etc., please. I would like to know if anyone has heard of this being done and/or if another members have ever done this in the long term.

If it will hurt the Van please say so and I'll put one in regardless of what my mechanic has said.

Thanks,

Chris Snider </HTML>


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.