Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 22:37:37 -0400
Reply-To: Doug Alcock <doug.alcock@GMAIL.COM>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: Doug Alcock <doug.alcock@GMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: Engine Conversion marketing survey
In-Reply-To: <e30c845b0705021910y6f683b2ehd2edf0a47910c8b@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Weenie also................
Cheers,
Doug
On 5/2/07, Peter T. Owsianowski <pnoceanwesty@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Guilty as charged...I'm a weenie, too, Jeff!
>
> Pete
> '79 Westy "Aardvark"
> '87 Westy "Joe's Van"
> '02 Audi A6 Avant
> WWW. Busesbythebeach.com
>
>
> On 5/2/07, Jeff Lincoln <magikvw@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Mike - I guess that puts me on the "weenie" list. (sigh)
> >
> > On 5/2/07, Michael Elliott <camping.elliott@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > You guys are annoying. You have the skills, space, time, knowhow and
> > > determination to actually pull off an engine upgrade. The list needs
> to
> > > be broken down into two halves. "Weenies" (like me) who think that
> > > replacing upper ball joints is big time mechanic work, and "Big Dogs"
> > > who laugh -- laugh, I tell you! -- at such twinkie work.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mike "Rocket J Squirrel" Elliott
> > > 71 Type 2: the Wonderbus
> > > 84 Westfalia: Mellow Yellow ("The Electrical Banana")
> > > 74 Utility Trailer. Ladybug Trailer, Inc., San Juan Capistrano
> > > KG6RCR
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sudhir Desai typed:
> > > > I would differ on the Audi V6 being the ONLY one that fits in the
> > > > Vanagon. However, I would agree with the fact that some work is
> > > > involved(no bolt-and-go).
> > > >
> > > > My old van with the 2.8L Chevy V6 fit (with some scraping of the
> > > > deck-lid insulation, and without spacing the engine carrier lower)
> > > >
> > > > I'm sure any 90-degree V6 would fit fine(since the 60-degree V6 fit
> > > > with some clearancing), considering the width would never exceed
> that
> > > > of the flat-4.
> > > >
> > > > Just my $.02 worth.
> > > > Sudhir
> > > >
> > > > On 5/2/07, John Reddick <SVYOLO@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > >> Mitsubishi patented, in the early 80's, a counterbalancing shaft
> for
> > > >> I-4's to eliminate the nasty second harmonic I-4s produce. They
> > > >> charged a
> > > >> fortune for the license and thus only Porsche ever paid them to use
> > it
> > > >> (944). The patent is now expired and I believe many companies now
> > use
> > > >> it. You are seeing much larger I-4's in the last couple of years:
> > > 2.4-2.5
> > > >> liters are getting common. I-4's are going to get larger, and
> better.
> > > >> The only modern V6 that fits, almost, into a Vanagon is the
> > > Audi/VW
> > > >> V6. It is very doable but the engines are expensive and not
> available
> > > in
> > > >> nearly large enough numbers to support 10 conversions a month.
> > > >>
> > > >> John
> > > >> Vanaru.com
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jeff
> > 90' Carat (It's Blue, It's Beautiful, It's naked inside - IT'S ALIVE!)
> > 86' (We call this one Parts)
> > 85' GL (Sidelined and feeling neglected)
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
--
http://www.dougalcock.com
|