Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 17:53:25 -0400
Reply-To: Jim Akiba <syncrolist@BOSTIG.COM>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: Jim Akiba <syncrolist@BOSTIG.COM>
Subject: politics of e85 RE: E85 in vanagons
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705211512250.4228@birdbird.example.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Most of the softparts will be ok, the one I'm wondering about is the fuel
pump, but we've found an e85 capable pump for $40 that can be had nationwide
just in case. Not sure about the plastic used for some parts etc.. remains
to be seen on the stock boxer.
The engine management for the stock boxer won't be able to compensate to run
e85 correctly, but it may run and might drive albeit very lean... question
is will the cooling effect of the e85 help avoid detonation running so lean?
Not sure, but somebody should try it.
You hit the nail on the head about the ethanol production. But not moving to
e85 isn't going to fight the battle you intend to engage in. Diesel is being
crippled through legislation in the US... unfortunately the big money guys
can make more pushing ethanol, and keep costs lower, so all the new
particulate emissions regs are killing light duty diesel infiltration... low
sulphur was supposed to open the floodgates for OEMS to bring in euro light
duty diesel, and now just in time for the low sulphur mandate to come into
effect they clamp down hard on particulates, an even more expensive and
currently complicated thing to curb in diesels.
The best thing is that I'm aware of several large scale cellulosic ethanol
plants, that are under production, but that don't know what process they are
going to use to make the ethanol... they are building the )@&$%@* plants but
haven't figured out the process yet... anyone puzzled? Me too. But just
follow the money up the yes men until it breaks on a fat cat.
IMHO Resisting ethanol is not the way to help the situation. And ethanol
isn't the holy grail, but it's a start, it's got the money behind it, and
it'll work for lot's of people's wallets now.. and it does burn much
cleaner. My question would be under current production methods, what's the
total emissions of the production of e85 vs gasoline given the energy
density differences.
The next thing that is going to happen to squash light duty diesels in the
US is the combo of GDI and either combined cycles or hybrids along with the
e85. They will continue to creep closer to diesel mpgs as time goes on. It's
cheaper to make GDI engines than fit light duty diesels with 5 way ammonia
or nox catalysts, unless there's a breakthrough, watch the BLUETEC
initiative to see if it's going to happen. If it fails, or doesn't make much
money kiss your light duty diesel wishes goobye for the next 8 years anyhow.
Jim Akiba
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Roberds [mailto:mattroberds@COX.NET]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 4:55 PM
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
Subject: Re: E85 in vanagons
> From: Adrian Bertarelli <abertarelli@GMAIL.COM>
> Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:03:56 -0600
>
> I haven't seen this question asked so i thought just for the
> discussion, what would it take to convert our stock engines to run
> on e85.
The first thing you have to do is make sure all the soft parts of the
fuel system are compatible with E85. E85 will eat some kinds of rubber
and plastic. Most newer hoses will be able to cope with at least E10,
but E85 may be too much for them. Unfortunately most aftermarket
suppliers won't know the answer to this question, so "fill it up and
see what starts leaking" is sometimes used as a test method.
If you do nothing else, the ECU will probably more or less deal with
the different fuel. If you do want to twiddle something, things in the
direction of making it run richer may help a little. E85 has less
energy than gasoline, so your engine power will be down. If it's engine
rebuild time, you can bump up the compression to get some of the power
back. If you bump it up enough, though, you have to run premium gas if
you're not running E85.
If you like the _idea_ of E85 but the above makes you uneasy, there is
something else you can do. Run regular gas in your van, but once a year,
drive out into the countryside. Find a farmer and hand him a couple of
hundred bucks, cash. This will achieve the same goals as E85 production
without all that fooling around with corn and combines and trucks and
refineries and stuff. By most accounts, ethanol from corn takes more
energy to produce than you get back from burning the ethanol - a lot of
the ethanol stuff is a way to subsidize farming without appearing to
subsidize farming. Yes, I know you can get a net energy gain by using
crops other than corn to make ethanol, but as far as I know, this is not
done in the US.
Biodiesel is _probably_ a net energy gain - you usually get more out
than you put into it. I don't think there's enough farmland for the US
to grow all of our fuel, but we can probably make a useful dent in what
we import if we decide we really want to.
The absolute sure-fire 100% guaranteed way to save money on gas is...
drive less! :) Then, do all the things that you've heard about since
1974... make sure your tires are full of air, change your fuel and air
filters regularly, keep your engine in good tune, drive sedately, etc.
When it's time for another car, consider one of the hybrids or the newer
common-rail-injection diesels. You will have to look in Tokyo and/or
Wolfsburg; Detroit isn't interested in building efficient cars. In
2007, there's no reason why your "daily driver" sedan shouldn't average
45-50 mpg.
Matt Roberds