Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2007, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 18 May 2007 08:21:41 -0400
Reply-To:     Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Engine rebuild/swap in an AT
Comments: To: markhersh@MSN.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

If fuel economy is the goal then an upgraded water boxer is not a favorable option. Presently, VW is offering reman engines again. It appears that new cases and new , non AMC heads are normal on these. 12 month/no mileage limit warranty. List is ~$2,570. As for Subies, maybe a 5% improvement unless you cans also do some gear changes and get lucky. Not likely with the auto. Larger tires can help with the re-gearing. As for a Diesel, do you have an emissions program where your are? Is a conversion legal? will it be later? What will the payoff be?

Dennis

>From: Mark Hersh <markhersh@MSN.COM> >Reply-To: Mark Hersh <markhersh@MSN.COM> >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >Subject: Engine rebuild/swap in an AT >Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:25:51 -0400 > >It's time for us to think about that. We have an 86 Weekender with 240K, >2.1 WBX and an auto tranny. I have been doing a bit of research into the >Subie and also a diesel. Just got done talking to a mechanic with lots of >Vanagon experience and he says to consider the Subie along with a 2.2 or >2.3 WBX rebuild. He says the diesel with the AT would require a ring and >pinion set that would increase the cost another 1500$, even on top of the >AT rebuild we were planning at the same time(240K miles, after all). > >One of the main reasons we were considering both the Subie and the diesel >was the increased mpg. From what I've read I think we can reasonably expect >20-24 mpg from a 2.2 Subaru. > >But a WBX rebuild.... ? Can anyone who has upgraded to a 2.2 or 2.3 L >rebuild with an AT report their mpg (with driving style)? We are not hot- >rods, 65, 70 mph tops. > >We are here in Seattle and he recommends a rebuild from Wolfsburg >Motorwerks. I got a recommendation for KC Martin in Lynnwood for the AT >work. Any comments on those places? > >Thanks > >Mark >86 Westfalia Weekender "Monty"


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.