Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2007, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 27 May 2007 15:36:55 -0400
Reply-To:     Jim Akiba <syncrolist@BOSTIG.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jim Akiba <syncrolist@BOSTIG.COM>
Subject:      Re: Octane smoctane
Comments: To: chrisrvanagon <chrisrvanagon@COMCAST.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <001201c79fdc$2195b7b0$6500a8c0@vash>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I'd expect to see little to no change in measuring 87 vs 91 mpg.. the reported difference is still smaller than your reasonable margin of error in figuring it out, which means that it's just too close to call for started, but for weenies sake...

Here's my understanding, and I'm sure there are much better ways to explain it. There are four factors we're talking about(excluding mechanical/internal engine changes because it's out of scope for this):

w) Spark advance

x) Fuel burn rate

y) Engine combustion pressures/temps

z) Pre-ignition/knock threshhold

You want y to be as high as possible without causing the engine to exceed z. To a point, this will give you the best volumetric efficiency(read power potential).

If you increase w or x, Z goes lower, Y higher If you decrease w or x, Z goes higher, Y lower If you increase W and decrease X, Z and Y go higher together

Opinion: If you increase Z and Y together, you'll gain marginal mpg if you demand the same amount of power, but your power potential increase will be higher than your mpg potential increase. If mpg is your goal, then increasing Y by means of less fuel and not more W, in conjunction with decreasing X to increase Z is the best way. But again that's out of scope since the boxer's engine management is not capable of doing this easily and safely.

If you do not have good control over W, and don't know Y and Z, playing with X is dangerous.

If you have good control over W, know Y and Z, playing with X can yield more power, but is usually close enough from the factory to not be worthwhile in normal driving conditions.

SO the real trick is always to maximize the potential of the fuel being used. Simply upping the octane won't do it unless the engine management system automatically tries to increase spark advance(which the boxer does not) so switching to higher octane alone is a waste of money, and running the lowest octane fuel you can will always yield the best volumetric efficiency, this is to say nothing of cost efficiency, but usually the gains in mpg potential will not offset the increased cost for higher octane fuel.

Not sure if that helps or makes it more confusing... maybe I added high octane fuel to the fire, which is of little value ha

Jim Akiba


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.