Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2007, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 22 May 2007 18:50:12 -0400
Reply-To:     Sam Conant <samcvt@COMCAST.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Sam Conant <samcvt@COMCAST.NET>
Subject:      Re: politics of e85 RE: E85 in vanagons
Comments: To: Greg Potts <greg@pottsfamily.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Tks for the response, Greg and, once again recognizing that this topic may not be interesting to our Westy purist brethren and sisters, I feel obligated to respond here.

Yes. Canadian grain production is an important and valued asset in the world markets' the bottom line, However, acknowledged within the agri-business world, is that shifting the distribution of just corn alone from the international food distribution stream into the industrial petroleum refining stream will effect the availability of food products world wide to all consumers including those of us who reside in North America. More, given the focus of what I consider idiotic U.S. attention to its southern border these days, I believe it is important to point out that "North America" is a geo-economic and geo-political term which applies to all nations north of the Panama Canal.

So, the idea of reducing food supplies by using corn and other food sources to our region by directed the flow of those resources into fuel production and distribution processes is really a "no brainer" process in my opinion.

SamC ----- Original Message ----- From: Greg Potts To: Sam Conant Cc: Vanagon List Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:16 PM Subject: Re: politics of e85 RE: E85 in vanagons

Hi Sam,

That might be true... But here in Canada we grow a LOT of corn for animal feed and vegetable oil. One of the studies I read mentioned that the byproducts of corn-produced ethanol actually make more productive animal feed than the original corn.

Also note that putting just 15% ethanol into gasoline means a potential 15% gain in oil refinery capacity. And refinery capacity is one of the reasons I keep hearing for the high cost of fuel here in the great white north. How true that is I am not qualified to say.

There is a LOT of disinformation out there about ethanol as a vehicle fuel, on both sides of the fence.

Happy Trails,

Greg Potts 1973/74/77/79 Westfakia "Bob The Tomato www.pottsfamily.ca www.busesofthecorn.com

On 22-May-07, at 1:20 PM, Sam Conant wrote:

More to the point though is the documentation that even if the U.S. converts

its entire annual corn yield via the distillation and refining process, at

tremendous infrastructure development and expense, the ethanol produce will

provide only a meager percentage of the total U.S. demand for fuel - at

today's rate!


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.