Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2007, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 26 Jun 2007 08:47:20 -0400
Reply-To:     Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: What is it with the US? (No real van content)
Comments: To: groups@WESTYVENTURES.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

There is a lot of technology in place to make these engines burn clean. Not just the lower sulphur fuel. Much of this technology is new and despite claims, time is needed to tell if it works and what maintenance will be reqiured to support it. It also requires the use of additonal chemicals. I have a Diesel with the so called soot collecting and oxidation exhaust. You gotta see the Fun Bus after the motor home tows it any distance. Clean it is not.

From an engineering point of view, the economy improvements of Diesel is typically in the 20-25% range. Most of this comes from the increase energy content of the fuel, reduction of pumping losses, (no throttle), and higher compression and excess air.

The down side is that the higher compression and excess air increase the production of NOx. Your modified engine with extra turbo boost and high capacity injectors adds to the NOx problem. If Diesel emissions testing comes your way, do you think you will pass?

The factory bare bones Diesel Vanagons didn't do 30 mpg. Your Syncro at 28 is exceptional. However you have to factor in the shorter engine life and overall cost per mile. Also factor the increased maintenance costs for the typical car owner. The gasoline engine is popular here due to the low overall costs and with current technology the cleaner choice. It almost like should you heat your house with oil or gas? Most folks choose natural gas if it is available.

Dennis

>From: Karl Mullendore <groups@WESTYVENTURES.COM> >Reply-To: Karl Mullendore <groups@WESTYVENTURES.COM> >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >Subject: Re: What is it with the US? (No real van content) >Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 01:10:25 -0400 > >The newest diesels coming from Honda, Subaru, Nissan, and yes, VW, are >purported to meet the same emission standards that are applied to their >gasoline conterparts. > >Diesels can get upward of 30-50% or more fuel mileage plus equal and >sometimes more power. Take my Syncro, for instance...former WBX at 16 mpg, >now gets 28 mpg AND has far more power. > >On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:33:43 -0700, Loren Busch <starwagen@GMAIL.COM> >wrote: > > >One point I haven't seen mention is CARB. The California CARB >requirements > >drive the auto industry, at least those that want to sell in the US. My > >understanding is that 'Diesel' is a dirty word in California. If true, >then > >why would anyone try to market a diesel vshicle in the US?


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.