Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (June 2007, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:36:25 -0400
Reply-To:     Jim Akiba <syncrolist@BOSTIG.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jim Akiba <syncrolist@BOSTIG.COM>
Subject:      Re: New Engine Conversion
In-Reply-To:  <0f5701c7b431$820bd840$c901a8c0@w2ktopcat>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

The ecotec is a world engine program just like the Zetec. The zetec is closer in design to the Mazda Duratec that ford is now using in the focus. The ecotec is a good engine as well, some of the reasons we didn't choose the ecotec to begin with were:

All-aluminum. The zetec uses a cast-iron block, with aluminum head and AL sub-crankcase, but is still lighter than the ecotec. So you get the durability/longevity of the cast iron, without taking a weight hit usually associated with it.

Better engine management with zetec, the ecotec shares many of the same features as the zetec, but in 2004, there weren't as many engine management options for it.

Zetec has no balance shafts. Which can be read fewer moving parts, and if the engine NVH can be managed without them... KISS

Size. The ecotec is larger/heavier than the zetec.

But these are small things, and won't be the true differentiators. The idea is a good one, and we're glad to have more support and recognition of this. It helps to reinforce what we've been saying for the last two years about the conversions, and why our engine choice was made and what the benefits can be. Starting with a good engine of the right generation, for the right reasons is only a start. The real task is adding value to the engine in the form of its implementation in a vanagon. Doing all of the design work to make it happen, revise/evolve it, work out the bugs, test it, support it etc, are going to be the crucial steps and the ones in which the value is created. It will be interesting to watch someone else's efforts that begin with a starting point similar to what ours was. The power options are good(I wish we had the higher base output), but people aren't primarily after power, they already prove that by owning a vanagon to begin with. Total or System reliability(of which engine reliability is a component) is the #1 return on investment people are after. Which is entirely correct, since the lack of reliability costs $$, slightly less power does not. That reliability is directly related to the quality of thought, depth and breadth of understanding, attention to detail, quality of manufacture, and efficiency of the organization responsible for the implementation of a given engine. A pricetag of $5800 is great, but is likely not sustainable for a turnkey, even based on the ecotec. So I expect the price will need to go up unless they are much futher along in design and know differently. It is different territory from starting with the subie conversion that needed compilation into a turnkey. This will be a good opportunity to show what they will do when building up from a lower level up. I would also suggest the adoption of a first install group program like we do. A lower price for the first install group provides value to guys that are willing to do a little work themselves on upgrades, design revs, swap parts etc in exchange for development testing help and the understanding that there will be issues along the way that need to be sorted. Anyhow, the next thing needed is to go from vaporware to reality, it will be more useful to examine and critique an actual conversion than speculate on what it may be like.

Welcome to the party!!

Jim Akiba

-----Original Message----- From: TC [mailto:trclark@SHAW.CA] Sent: 2007-06-21 2:25 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: New Engine Conversion

hehe hum > as the basis for this new conversion. The only close competitor was the > Ford Zetec, but the Ecotec line had far more factory engine choices (142, > 172, 205, 265hp) versions and NO TIMING BELT. luv to hear from the guys at Bostig pro/con the Zetec vs Ecotec I am sure they already did the R&D b4 they thought the Zetec was THE one how many of those are mfg ,is that a world motor so you can get parts ANYwhere ?


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.