Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2007, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:11:41 -0400
Reply-To:     Thor Svenson <syncromonster@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Thor Svenson <syncromonster@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Engine Conversion MPG - We don't need no stink'n TDI

i've got some serious doubt on the accuracy of these claims: a subaru with this SAME engine doesn't get that mileage!!! better aerodynamics and less weight, less mileage than what you're claiming. and you want us to believe a syncro with that engine gets MORE? maybe down a lot of long hills.

thor

[if these figures were accurate, a tdi would get 45 in a syncro, btw]

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:43:35 -0400, John Reddick <svyolo@YAHOO.COM> wrote:

>My personal 87 MT Westy has had 7 different Subaru engines in it in the last >year. 1 SVX, 1 EJ22, and 5 EJ25's. I have tried numerous intakes, exhausts, >tires, etc. I have a 1.14 3rd, .70 4th (very tall), 16" Michelin Hydroedge >tires. No roof racks, no side awning. I was getting a consistent 24 MPG with >all the EJ25's, at my normal 65-70 mph. I made a couple of other minor mods >recently. I just drove to West River Westies, then through the mountains of >VT and NY for 4 days. 1000 miles. 2 tanks of gas in the mountains 30-65 >mph, driving very aggressively, and 2 tanks of gas on the interstates, going >65-70. Results: >23.8 and 25.0 mpg in the mountains. >25.9 and 26.2 mpg on the interstates > >No AC, windows down also. > >These numbers are GPS verified/corrected. No, you won't get this in a >knobby tired Syncro Westie at 85 mph, carrying 4 kayaks on the roof. > The mileage has been extremely consistent through all 5 EJ25's before >the current changes. I would expect the same by swapping a different long >block. > The EJ25 handles the tall 4th fine. 70 mph is 3200 rpm instead of the >stock 4000. The taller gearing only accounts for about a 2mpg difference >but makes the driving quieter/more relaxed. You still downshift on big >hills, but only 1/5th as often as a WBXer. Most hills can be pulled in top >gear easily. Really steep, tall mountains can be climbed in 3rd at 55-65 mph. > There are still 1 or 2 minor changes I am going to try. I should get >to them in the next month. > > John > East Coast Vanagon


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.