Date:         Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:59:22 -0700
Reply-To:     Scott Daniel - Shazam <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Scott Daniel - Shazam <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
Subject:      Re: FS
Comments: To: Mike S <mikes@FLATSURFACE.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <20070728040323.89B191165C3@hamburg.alientech.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

With the pics of the interior though, they wouldn't actually be fooling
anyone.
If it's not a factory installation, they 'should' make that clear of course
- at least that would be nice.

-----Original Message-----
From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of
Mike S
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 9:03 PM
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
Subject: Re: FS

At 10:05 PM 7/27/2007, Roger Whittaker wrote...
>this is stated as being a not westy ...
>1989 Syncro Westy Vanagon Audi 1.8 Turbo...
>Custom interior by Westy Conversions in Colorado.

Calling it a "Westy" based on a conversion by a company which is
deliberately named to create confusion doesn't, IMHO, constitute
"stated as being a not westy."

It shouldn't be listed as a "Westy Vanagon," which is universally
understood by VW enthusiasts to mean a Westfalia-Werke GmbH conversion.
Much better if it were hyped as a "Synchro Vanagon coverted by Westy of
Colorado," or in some way made obvious that it isn't what everyone
considers a "Westy" to be.