Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2007, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:33:26 -0700
Reply-To:     Scott Daniel - Shazam <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Scott Daniel - Shazam <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM>
Subject:      Re: Power output of actual vans? (long)
Comments: To: FrankGRUN@AOL.COM
In-Reply-To:  <cad.1637ae1d.33dcfa85@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Re the cone on the rear idea, to fill in that low pressure area, And thus reduce drag, I've always noticed that if you just open the rear hatch about 50 degrees..... You've got most of that 'rear cone' already. Plus it's got a window right where you want it ! Plus it increases interior useful volume . What's not to like ?! Just a matter of finishing it off cleanly, having not look dorky, And Keeping engine access reasonable.... Perhaps the whole rear hatch re-made in fiberglass.............but in the form of a bubble....about like you opened the stock rear hatch halfway and then filled in all the gaps.

And retain the stock rear window and rubber window seal. Hinges at the top so it's out of the way when opened.... Rounded off some so no sharp edges..... Done right it could look and work quite nicely, with increases in interior volume, reduced drag at speed, no particular weight penalty if done well enough, The only penalty being increased overall length, but completely worth that small trade off for the gains realized in two very useful areas. In mass production in fiberglass....hmmm.....I know this vanagon tdi guy in Ohio......plastics and fiber glass is 'what he does' ...made his own hi-top roof, etc..... Hmmmm.......might be $ 1,500 dollars for deluxe production model.....but you only have to buy it once, and the increased interior room would make it worthwhile until you get that 1,500 back is reduced fuel consumption.

I'm always looking to optimize cost-benefit ratio. I can see the need for a small bumper on the back ....need to make the 'most rearward' point of the van be able to bump into something with out harm to paint and bodywork. Figuring to truncate the last 8 inches or so. This reduces over all length by say 10 % ( of just this hatch portion, not the whole van ) but it only reduces the fuel mileage gain by 2 % say, and it gives a nice spot for 'something' for a light bumper thing - perhaps a light weight stainless tube across the back. Good to hang your wet suit or bathing suit on to dry too ( multi-functionality designed in from the start !! )

'Useful tradeoffs' with a eye to always maximize cost/benefit ratio - always. Not just dollar costs either, weight costs, size costs, etc.

Maybe some solar panels to help provide juice for the electro-hydraulic system used to raise and lower it ......hmmmmm....nah ! to complex. Quad hatch struts is fine enough. Nice court story. I can visualize it quite well , thanks Frank ! Good thing that judge was a former VW head ! Scott www.turbovans.com

-----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of Frank Grunthaner Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 1:01 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Power output of actual vans? (long)

In a message dated 7/28/07 11:05:21 AM, syncrolist@bostig.com writes:

> Ha I liked your reply Frank. Excellent. We have multiple dyno charts all > taken from the same chassis dyno for a vanaru 2.2, tiico HO, 2 wbxers, 4 > different zetecs, 1 supercharged zetec, and coming soon e85 naturally aspirated > zetec, and e85 supercharged zetec.. as well as the upcoming turbo kit(the entire > exhaust tract is now complete)  Having all this info from the same dyno is

> quite nice, and really the only way to do it. As Mark points out, it is the > "complete" inforamtion that is really required. BTW Frank, Clint(a listmemeber > and solidworks guru) is helping us model the vanagon so we can put it into a > CFD virtual wind tunnel... my intention is to build a collaspable colluder

> cone (see through on top) to see how much fuel efficiency we can gain at cruise > with a simple strap on cone of reasonable size that is easy to produce and

> inexpensive. I think given the low pressure area we always drag around behind > us, it may be a substantial improvement. >   > Jim Akiba > > > Jim,

Egad a reply to one of my rants! Exciting! I fully agree that results from the same dyno with the same operator seriously increase the quality of the data but more importantly the reality factor inherent in its comparative interpretation. For some time my son and I were developing a Solidworks based model of the Westfalia to tighten up the drag issues. Our power numbers come to second difference velocity curves taken at the Pomona International Dragway (when unoccupied by paying nutsos). We were also looking at FemLab for a far more detailed treatment.

In the course of these experiments, two areas showed enough promise to warrant some measurements. We looked at the rear drag profile and undercarriage sealing. For the rear drag issue, we modeled pressure zone profiles and put together three plastic hemi-balloons and taped then to the rear. I have to go back to my notes at the time but we reduced drag by 12 to 18%. In one test, the number was 33% but it couldn't be duplicated. (In the spirit of some tuners, I should have used this for an SAE paper). The upshot of this was that I got pulled over (we were testing at night on the Palmdale highway) by the CHP and got ticketed for occluded rear vision. Went to the court to fight the ticket. Had a full sheaf of papers. The judge listened attentively (!). He remarked that when younger he had had a bay window bus that just blew all over the road and asked if such mods would have any effect on stability. I offered that it was in the relm of possibility. I them looked around the courtroom to see blank stares for a mass of humanity that that must have thought I came from area 51. Finally the judge stopped the discussion, announced that this was the singularly most unusual anti-ticket response he ever heard, congratulated me for originality and dismissed the ticket with a warning about frightening other drivers at night.

The point here relates to the fundamental flaw. The rear balloon worked, we had an idea for speed related inflation, etc, etc, but no answer for rear vision. Practicality --- zip, but fun.

The second idea worked well and is a real solution. The open underside of the vanagon is a real drag component. We got a set of thin 0.0625 inch Al sheet stock and enclosed (frame rail to frame rail) and basically covered the underside from the front to the transmission. We added louvered slots for the radiator air flow, left the spare tire cover operable and stayed away from suspension components. Big decrease in drag - minimum 8% max 15%. 15% came when we added the Diesel sound box cover. Serviceability was a problem. The system has been removed as I complete the front to back dual muffler system for the TDi and the diesel fired heater. No temperature measurements, but we provide for air

inlets at front by gas tank and at egress at the rear. Work in progress.

Frank Grunthaner

************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.