Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2007, week 5)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:02:40 -0700
Reply-To:     Alistair Bell <albell@UVIC.CA>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Alistair Bell <albell@UVIC.CA>
Subject:      Re: Some aerodynamic ideas..
Comments: To: Don Hanson <dhanson@GORGE.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <000401c7d257$6063f620$30b2d8d1@dhanson>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;

lets not get too technical Don:)

un-attached flow can be less drag in certain situations. initiating separation of laminar flow has been used to reduce drag. but that's on pretty smooth bodies. the lumpy van is not in the same league.

boundary layers are pretty darn thin, I think with the van(and its speed) we're talking more gross aero effects. See attached image for some simple flows around various vanagons.

Alistair


On 29-Jul-07, at 8:11 PM, Don Hanson wrote:

Well the rear certainly does drag along a lot of turbulent air. But the front end starts all the turbulence, and once it becomes un-attached from the object, it hardly ever goes back into a smooth, linear flow, which has the least drag.. So the air probably is pretty disturbed all along the sides and roof. Under, you have the boundary layer to consider, probably beyond our discussion here, though a belly pan would do wonders, and it wouldn't make the Vanagon into a Frankenstein with visible add-on body work. For the rear, perhaps you could fabricate some kinda "Space Case" type luggage compartment that might fill the vacuum behind the rear...Or a slick receiver hitch cargo/aero compartment AND another mounted right behind the rear glass..The least that would give you would be some "free" (no negative aero consequences) carrying capacity for bulky items.. You might get some small improvements with flaps and spoilers..but that would take real science to see if indeed it actually worked...The wing on the 928 rear hatch was just such a beastie...not a wing for downforce, but a spoiler to help release the air and reduce drag..The 928 also came with full belly pans...but like everything on that particular car, they were over-engineered and total pain...it took an hour to change the oil because of those belly pans.. Don Hanson

----- Original Message ----- From: "Alistair Bell" <albell@uvic.ca> To: "Don Hanson" <dhanson@GORGE.NET> Cc: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 11:00 PM Subject: Re: Some aerodynamic ideas..

> Don, > > good points but what about the rear end? In my opinion its the > draggiest part of the beast. > > Alistair


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.