Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2007, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:29:15 -0700
Reply-To:     Joseph Fortino <fortino1@EARTHLINK.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Joseph Fortino <fortino1@EARTHLINK.NET>
Subject:      Re: 50 Worst Cars
Comments: To: vanagonvw <vanagonvw@GMAIL.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I only wrote of the HUMMER, didnt say anything about the Model T.

-----Original Message----- >From: vanagonvw <vanagonvw@GMAIL.COM> >Sent: Sep 10, 2007 12:18 PM >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >Subject: Re: 50 Worst Cars > >Joseph Fortino wrote: >>>> >>>> How can you really rag on the Model T? > >Yea, that was really hard to believe. I guess he has the same opinion of >the Wright Bros plane <shrug> > >>>> Plus I really really liked mu >>>> Chevette - not coll but that car ran forever. >>>> > >Chevette! Mine is still running at 190K miles. Bought it new in 84 for >$4700. Still gets over 40mpg on the highway, and is stuck on 33mpg >around town. Seems it is the car I can depend on whenever I need to go >and get parts for my van, and the other vehicles in the family. Not >pretty, but how much money it saved me over the years, is uncountable :-) > >Most of the crappy cars in the late 70's and early 80's are the result >of apathy by the car companies, of course, but its rather important to >remember that the morons in Congress were caught up in the energy crisis >of the day, so without a whole lot of understanding of the industry, >they came up with some really stupid standards of mileage and safety >that the General Motors types of the day, were woefully unprepared to >deal with. > >It has to fall on the manufacturers, but as with so many other things >that the feds stuck their nose into, they really messed it up even >worse. I recall a few mid 70's machines with smog pumps, ridiculous >emissions controls, low grade gas and just no guts at all, that I swear, >were probably dirtier than the late 60's beasts I would street race with. > >Basically, what saved all our collective bacon, is the catalytic >converter. Without it, I cannot imagine how bad our air would be. Since >its inception, the decrease in smog in the denser cities has been very >dramatic. Kudos to whomever invented it, and helped to almost perfect >it. About every three years I replace the one on my chevette, and the >emissions drop to nearly zero all the way around. Tremendous invention.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.