Date:         Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:57:17 -0700
Reply-To:     Joseph Fortino <fortino1@EARTHLINK.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Joseph Fortino <fortino1@EARTHLINK.NET>
Subject:      Re: 50 Worst Cars
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

HUMMER and not the good one.. LOL,, also any SUV in my eyes/



-----Original Message-----
>From: Jeffrey Vickers <jeff@VICKERSDESIGN.COM>
>Sent: Sep 10, 2007 9:10 AM
>To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
>Subject: Re: 50 Worst Cars
>
>There's a great little book out called "Crap Cars" by Richard Porter.
>Each page lists a different crap car (50 total) and how it got that
>status. Very funny writing. Porter is a writer for Top Gear so these
>crap cars were picked by those guys who IMHO, have a pretty good
>sense of what constitutes a crap car. BTW, the Ford Mustang II got
>top honors.
>
>Jeff
>
>
>On Sep 10, 2007, at 7:50 AM, Automatic digest processor wrote:
>
>> Date:    Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:21:40 -0500
>> From:    Jeff Lincoln <magikvw@GMAIL.COM>
>> Subject: Re: 50 worst cars, and the vanagon isn't one of them
>>
>> This car list sucks. I agree that most of this guys criticism is
>> based on
>> pure opinion.
>>
>> How can you really rag on the Model T? Plus I really really liked mu
>> Chevette - not coll but that car ran forever.