Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2007, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 12 Sep 2007 22:26:27 -0700
Reply-To:     Mark Keller <kelphoto@TELUS.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Mark Keller <kelphoto@TELUS.NET>
Subject:      Porsche Conversion
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Passing along the comment of Jim Miller who had a 3.2 in the same van he now has a subi-a-roo aka Fuji Heavy Industries putter plant. FWIW.

Hi Mark,

Its been a while since I last saw you. The Porsche engine is gone I am afraid. This motor went back into a 3.2 911. I must have sold it about two years ago.

> From my expierence with this conversion and the subaru conversion > there is

no way i would use the porsche engine again. The Subaru is more efficent, cheaper to run, gentler on the transmision,smoother, and sounds dead stock with a very little snarl.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.