Just wanted to follow up on this: I just got off the phone with Mobil 1. The technician I spoke with said that the 15w50 still had high levels of Zinc and Phosphorus, even with the SM rating. So unless anybody hear knows otherwise, I'm going to assume it's okay... -Wes
Wesley Pegden wrote: > I know the SM discussion was just had recently. However, reading > through that discussion, it seems nobody mentioned this: > > The "reintroduced" 15w-50 Mobil 1 oil is SM rated. It is not clear to > me whether it has enough of the anti-wear additives, after reading lots > of pages online of various tests of the oil. Mobil-1's site has > generally cryptic answers, which I don't generally trust. > > I know there is plenty of dino oil with 20w50 or equivalent with no SM > rating and presumably the correct levels of Zinc, etc. What about > synthetics? Are there equivalent synthetics with known good levels of > additives? (Castrol?) Or does anyone have a good reason to think that > the Mobil 1 is still a good choice? > > |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.