Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2007, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:38:22 -0700
Reply-To:     David Marshall <mailinglist@FASTFORWARD.CA>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Marshall <mailinglist@FASTFORWARD.CA>
Subject:      Re: MAF sensor and a waterboxer
In-Reply-To:  <ac1f198b0710011007k36b44505y48e278fcddc09032@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Isn't saying a GM MAF (BTW... there's no apostrophe for more than one MAF!) sort of like saying a VW MAF considering a Golf I4 and VR6 MAF are different things so why would one assume that all GMs use the same MAF? Perhaps it would be better to get the model and year of the vehicle that has the correct MAF?

Just a though...

David Marshall

http://www.hasenwerk.ca http://www.fastforward.ca

Box 4153, Quesnel BC, Canada V2J 3J2

On Mon, October 1, 2007 10:07, Jim Akiba wrote: > I remember GM MAF's are karman units, and produce a frequency based > "count" > for the ECU, this would definitely not work properly without conversion... > hence the black smoke at startup(bad too rich) and extremely high MPG(bad, > too lean) The fact that he can drive it like that at all is surprising. > > Put a wide band O2 on the setup and watch it during a drive cycle. It's > likely a nightmare. > > Jim Akiba > > On 10/1/07, Tabe Johnson <greentabe-vanagon@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> Man, that's worth a look, even if you don't buy the van! Uh, would >> you mind bringing a camera and taking a bunch of photos of what he did >> while you're there? >> >> >> tabe johnson/87 westy >> (Interested in the MAF setup, but not believing the 26 MPG... Maybe he >> has one of those >> electric turbocharger setups...) >> >> >> >> >> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:43:17 -0700 >> From: Clint Kolda <clint_kolda@YAHOO.COM> >> Subject: MAF sensor and a waterboxer >> >> I just called a guy about a 1985 vanagon that he has for sale. He said >> he >> removed the AFM and >> wired in a GM mass airflow sensor. He said he now gets 26-27MPG. He >> indicated there is a little >> black smoke at startup, otherwise runs OK. Has anyone heard of this >> mod? What's a good price >> for a >> used AFM these days? Maybe the van will need one. >> >> Clint >> >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.