Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 2007, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:33:34 -0400
Reply-To:     Jim Akiba <syncrolist@BOSTIG.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Jim Akiba <syncrolist@BOSTIG.COM>
Subject:      Re: Hybrid Engine Conversion
Comments: To: Karin Baker & Raymond Paquette <raymondpaquette@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <5d903de80710041138h1e780b7amdfdbb3d757675907@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Yeah it would be a big issue. It would certainly be really weird feeling ... but body roll could be kept to almost nothing ha doubt if it's a good idea, but it's fun to think about.. just like the hybrid. Fun to think about, but sadly not really worth doing at the moment.

On 10/4/07, Karin Baker & Raymond Paquette <raymondpaquette@gmail.com> wrote: > > Jim > > I've often wondered how about this. Ultimately, you could keep storing > and removing energy from the flywheel as your power needs changed-allowing > ICE to run at a more constant speed. > > Seems like a great idea, but I wonder about the gyroscopic effect. I > think you could end up with some very odd and dangerous struggles with > steering and handling. > > Opinions? > > Raymond > > On 10/4/07, Jim Akiba <syncrolist@bostig.com> wrote: > > > > Seems to me hybrid would not be a good fit for a marine application, > > varying > > rpm, load, and regen braking are where the hybrid is compelling as you > > pointed out. I believe that in our vans(typically lot's of hwy miles) > > the > > total thermal efficiency is going to be low enough that other > > technologies > > will make more sense before current hybrid technology for efficiency. > > For > > me, because I use my 9 pass. as a daily driver, and it's mostly city > > miles, > > it might be great from an efficiency standpoint. From a cost standpoint > > it's > > still really high. There is another even simpler way to have some of > > the > > exact same benefits would mentioned. Good old flywheels. Imagine a > > monster > > flywheel with axis of rotation up/down under the van dead center. It > > would > > be cool because not only could you use it to store, and retrieve energy > > like > > a hybrid system, but it would gyroscopically stabilize the van in the > > correct plane and in theory would be more efficient itself at storing > > mechanical energy because there is no transformation required. Make it > > as > > heavy as one of the hybrid battery packs as large in diameter as > > possible > > with the weight biased to the outside edge, and spin it as fast as > > realistically possible and I wonder what kind of thermal efficiency you > > could reach in city driving. > > > > Jim Akiba > > > > > > > > On 10/4/07, Mark Keller < kelphoto@telus.net> wrote: > > > > > > Hi gang, > > > > > > With the question of making a hybrid a I'm a bit of a neophyte, but In > > > researching a hybrid install for a marine customer I came across a > > > couple of websites that explain to some of us why putting an electric > > > motor on a ICE, internal combustion engine, can actually improve the > > ICE > > > fuel mileage, and in course have beneficial effects on emissions. I've > > > > > summarized it below and included the websites at the bottom > > > > > > The Basic benefiting principle is that ICE are not equally efficient > > at > > > converting fuel to usable work at all RPM ranges. Most efficient is > > at > > > combination of gearing, 75% throttle and RPM. Least efficient at idle > > > and anything less than 75% throttle. Hybrid Engine controllers > > > supplement the ICE with the electrical motor at the less efficient ICE > > > > > RPMs, and recover some of the electrical energy in braking and when at > > > efficient ICE RPMs. > > > > > > The other benefits: ( Inductively thinking is all I have to go on so > > be > > > forewarned). Engine life would be enhanced, since it's overall load > > is > > > reduced by transferring electrical power in demand situations where > > the > > > ICE is not at it's most thermally efficient RPM range. This "power" is > > > partly free, in that the EC, engine controller, recovers electrical > > > energy by charging the batteries, which is a "braking effect" on the > > > vehicle. Brakes on the vehicle last longer, since they see less > > > stopping momentum. You get the idea. > > > > > > The rest of the electrical power comes from two sources. When the > > > engine is at cruise RPM, aka a efficient thermal RPM and the load on > > the > > > engine permits, charging of the batteries takes place. The EC takes > > > care of this "seamlessly". The other charge is the nightly plug in. > > > > > > In my opinion, while none of the above operations occur at ideal rpms > > to > > > the power/generation electric motor, or the ICE, a recognizable > > benefit > > > does occur. I say this because in a true application, the ICE would > > only > > > operate at it's optimum thermal efficient RPM in order to supply the > > > electric motor. This is not completely a windfall though as pound for > > > pound, the electric motor needed to replace the ICE's torque is heavy, > > > > > some 600lbs. Nor is a 50kw electric motor Cheap! > > > > > > Another good thing is that the waterboxer is light at 265lbs and the > > > engine's combustion chamber designe is particular efficient at cruise > > > rpm. Even more so with an updated EC. So in my opinion a pretty > > > competitive application of technology to the waterboxer. > > > > > > In another twist I think that the elusive "more torque" question is > > > solved by the electric motor being there to help get extra boost to > > move > > > the vehicle when needed. This is subtle but the key is that the > > torque > > > boost helps by getting the waterboxer RPMs up to it's power > > range. This > > > is important because the engine is so weak at lower RPMs, I believe we > > > would see a greater benefit than other vehilce/engine combinations. > > > > > > Thanks for listening in > > > > > > Mark > > > In order of relevance > > > Diesel-electric marine propulsion systems and accessories. > > > < > > > http://www.ossapowerlite.com/tech_library/fuel_efficiency/fuel_efficiency.htm > > > > > > > > > KTA Services Inc. < http://www.kta-ev.com/> > > > L.M.C. Manufacturers of Permanent Magnet DC Motors > > > < http://www.lemcoltd.com/performance.htm> > > > Curtis Instruments- Instrumentation, motor speed controllers, battery > > > chargers <http://www.curtisinst.com/> > > > > > > DetectorTechnologies.com - Product Catalog > > > < http://www.detectortechnologies.com/store/SearchResult.aspx?CategoryID=5 > > > > > > > > > ASMO Marine <http://www.asmomarine.com/2005/asmo_uk/00.shtml> > > > taylorproductolinecard-bilingual.pdf (application/pdf Object) > > > <http://www.taylorproducto.ca/taylorproductolinecard-bilingual.pdf> > > > http://www.steamboating.net/ > > > > > > Boat Design Net - the Boat Design and Boat Building Site > > > <http://boatdesign.net/> > > > has a Hybrid forum under the propulsion section. > > > Boat Design Net - the Boat Design and Boat Building Site > > > <http://boatdesign.net/> > > > > > > > > > > > > < http://www.taylorproducto.ca/taylorproductolinecard-bilingual.pdf > > > > <http://www.steamboating.net/> > > > > > > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.