Date:         Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:48:18 -0700
Reply-To:     neil N <musomuso@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         neil N <musomuso@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Passat 2.0L engine questions
Comments: To: Bob Stevens <mtbiker62@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To:  <BAY136-W155392B80EB48BB96CDE9FA5A20@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Good point. That's the main reason for my question.

Risky business and pretty much pointless buying it as a donor if
engine is an intereference type.

From what I can see it has (IMHO) high KM's on engine. Car has
"almost" 300K Km's. Likely I wouldn't go for it just for that reason.

Best of luck with swap!

Neil.

On 10/14/07, Bob Stevens <mtbiker62@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Just a thought:
>
> If this engine isn't running, and the seller says it needs a cam belt and tensioner, and it's an interference engine ...... isn't it possible that all the valves have been driven into the piston tops as a result of a running-engine-belt-failure?
>
> Pardon my paranoia but I just had that happen to my TIICO (an interference engine) a month ago.
>
> Bob ..... having an EJ22 installed this week .... a non interference engine, and with 10+ more HP than that Passat motor.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Café. Stop by today.
> http://www.cafemessenger.com/info/info_sweetstuff2.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_OctWLtagline


-- 
Neil Nicholson. 1981 Air Cooled Westfalia -
"Jaco"  (Bustorius)

http://web.mac.com/tubaneil

Please send fav Vanagon/Westfalia links to me at:
musomuso1963@hotmail.com