<Correct me if I'm wrong, but that looks like a 72 or newer Van , not a 68.>
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this was covered here on vanagon.com maybe 2(?) weeks ago. Yeah it's a '72, but someone emailed the ad agency who then claimed it was a "modified" '68. Lets face it, an EXTREMELY small part of the population will recognize it as a '72 and not a '68. Jeff |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.