Date:         Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:23:39 -0500
Reply-To:     Mike Collum <collum@VERIZON.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Mike Collum <collum@VERIZON.NET>
Subject:      Re: AFM Characteristics
Comments: cc: Evan Mac Donald <macdonald1987@SBCGLOBAL.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <47372AE2.7020002@verizon.net>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

But ... we do know that the European 2.1 digijet ECU will work with a US
1.9 AFM.  Hmmmmmm

Mike


Mike Collum wrote:
> It's my understanding that the European 2.1 "Digijet" ECU will work with
> a US 2.1 AFM and throttle body when set up as a 1.9 (2.1 in an '83 1/2
> to '85 Vanagon).  I don't know about a US 2.1 AFM working with a 1.9
> ECU, though.
>
> Mike
>
>
> Evan Mac Donald wrote:
>> I have a question about WBX AFMs.
>>
>>   How different are the 1.9 and 2.1 AFMs? There are physical
>> differences - throat size is different, and the attachment diameter is
>> different for the boot. How different are the electronic signal
>> outputs? Can a 2.1 item be used on a 1.9, without causing the ECU
>> fatal and/or uncorrectable confusion?
>>
>>   I saw a 1.9 fitted with a 2.1, and wondered if that could work
>> PROPERLY....
>>
>>   Thanks
>>
>