Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2007, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 25 Nov 2007 15:29:16 -0800
Reply-To:     Michael Elliott <camping.elliott@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Michael Elliott <camping.elliott@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Calculate fuel consumption when idling?
Comments: To: Mike <mbucchino@charter.net>
In-Reply-To:  <008301c82f86$672e7480$0a00a8c0@OWNERMIKE>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Well, ya stumped me on this one. I have no idea whether this means that my engine would consume more fuel than I calculated, or less.

-- Mike "Rocket J Squirrel" Elliott 71 Type 2: the Wonderbus 84 Westfalia: Mellow Yellow ("The Electrical Banana") 74 Utility Trailer. Ladybug Trailer, Inc., San Juan Capistrano KG6RCR

On 11/25/2007 9:12 AM Mike wrote:

> The flaw here is that no naturally-aspirated engine has 100% volumetric > efficiency. So, you'd have to factor the actual VE, which is probably about > as low as it ever could be while running at idle. (Even a super- or > turbo-charged engine has no boost at idle.) > > Mike B. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Elliott" <camping.elliott@GMAIL.COM> > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 11:01 AM > Subject: Re: Calculate fuel consumption when idling? > > >> Hmmm. >> >> Each piston will still suck in 475 cc of air/fuel per intake cycle. But >> instead of the air being at normal atmospheric pressure, it sucks on the >> intake manifold/plenum, which is at around 11'' Hg of vacuum, or 11'' Hg >> less than the outside air pressure (Bentley's does not come right out and >> say that 11'' Hg is the normal vacuum inside the plenum but it can be >> inferred from from several of their measurement procedures). Mean sea >> level pressure is about 30'' Hg, so the plenum contains 19'' Hg of >> pressure, which is about the same as being at 12,000 feet elevation >> according to the online Density Altitude Calculator at >> http://wahiduddin.net/calc/calc_da.htm -- if I'm using it right. 70F, >> 30''Hg altimeter setting, 40F dew point. >> >> Under these conditions, air density is 62% of sea level air. So my Junior >> Engineer's cocktail napkin result of 1.6 gallons per hour of fuel >> consumption when idling (below) needs to be reduced to 1 gallon per hour. >> >> >> -- >> Mike "Rocket J Squirrel" Elliott >> 71 Type 2: the Wonderbus >> 84 Westfalia: Mellow Yellow ("The Electrical Banana") >> 74 Utility Trailer. Ladybug Trailer, Inc., San Juan Capistrano >> KG6RCR >> >> >> >> On 11/25/2007 12:06 AM John Connolly, Aircooled.Net wrote: >> >>> but we have a throttle limiting the amt of air entering the engine >>> (unless >>> you have a diesel). >>> >>> John >>> Aircooled.Net Inc. >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "mike elliott" <camping.elliott@GMAIL.COM> >>> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> >>> Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 5:26 PM >>> Subject: Re: Calculate fuel consumption when idling? >>> >>> >>>> Do you win? Heck, I don't know. I'll take a shot at it. Watch me get >>>> it spectacularly wrong. >>>> >>>> The 1.9L engine has 475cc displacement per cylinder. I think two >>>> cylinders fire per revolution, so at 900 rpm we got 900 x 2 x 475 = >>>> 855cc of air per minute being sucked into the engine. If the mixture >>>> is a good stoichiometric one, we'd have about a 1:15 fuel:air mass >>>> ratio. Air has a mass of 1.3g per liter, so that's .855 x 1.3 = 1.1kg >>>> of air per minute, with being one-fifteenth of that, or 74g per >>>> minute. At 60 minutes that's 4.4kg of fuel. Gasoline masses roughly >>>> 740 grams per /liter, so that's 6 liters, roughly 1.6 gallons U.S. per >>>> hour. >>>> >>>> Those are the numbers I come up with and I bet they're within an order >>>> of magnitude of being right. >>>> >>>> Mike "Rocket J Squirrel" Elliott >>>> >>>> On Nov 24, 2007 3:52 PM, Matthew Snook <matt@snooksband.com> wrote: >>>>> 0.9375? Is that right? Do I win? >>>>> >>>>> :) >>>>> >>>>> At 60mph, mine's turning @ 3200rpm. It will burn 3 gallons doing that. >>> 3 >>>>> gallons per hour at 3200rpm. But it idles at 1000rpm. So that comes >>>>> to >>>>> 0.9375 gallons per hour at 1000rpm. Of course there's no wind >>> resistance at >>>>> that speed, so maybe less... >>>>> >>>>> Matthew Snook (@ ~3000 ft) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Michael Elliott >>>>> Subject: Calculate fuel consumption when idling? >>>>> >>>>> A properly-tuned 1.9L WBX engine would consume how many gallons of >>>>> gasoline per hour when idling at sea level? Would this be significantly >>>>> different at 6,000 feet? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> !DSPAM:4748b1c081151569112627! >>>> >>>> > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.