Date:         Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:00:53 +0000
Reply-To:     kayakjr@COMCAST.NET
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         John Reynolds <kayakjr@COMCAST.NET>
Subject:      Re: '84 value?
Comments: cc: scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM

" The next year, 85 is considerably better, and 86 to 91's much better yet. "

Can Scott or someone else explain how an 85 is considerably better than an 84, and why an 86, besides having a 2.1, is even better.  I'm curious.

It seems to me that if you are going to do an engine conversion, then perhaps picking up one of these 84's is the way to go - no?

John
87 VW WWW or VW W^3 or is that V(W)^4 ? (Wolfsburg Wesfalia Weekender)

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!

Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com

The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.