Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 2007, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:02:49 -0800
Reply-To:     David Kao <dtkao0205@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         David Kao <dtkao0205@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: Municipal camper bans
Comments: To: PB <pbrattan@GMAIL.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <699b6e3f0712111915n10eae9aevb0a9e0052508caca@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

It looks like most cities in California are similar in that. RVs parking in the street has a 72 hour limitation. However, if no one complains no enforcement will occur. Trailer is a different situation. They do not allow trailers parked on the driveway for some reason. It may have something to do with fire hazard. But I believe owners will be warned before they give tickets.

San Jose has a weird ordinance that I have a tough time to believe. The city bans engine rebuild (and other major repairs) in private properties, including in your own garage. When I was young and had no ownership of any property it was the ability to work on my own cars in my own driveway or garage that drove me to buy my own house. It ended up that I can't do it still after owning a house in San Jose. Very weird.

David

--- PB <pbrattan@GMAIL.COM> wrote:

> I meant to post this, but sent it just to David instead! (Sorry, David.) I > live in Los Angeles, and here it appears to be a "free-for-all!" I've seen > plenty of RV's parked in the street and in driveways. I've heard that > parking on your own lawn is not permitted, but have never seen Traffic > Enforcement do anything about it. I have 2 driveways, and I sometimes park > in the street blocking one of my own driveways, and I've never had a > problem. The only "rule" that actually gets enforced is when a vehicle is > parked in the same spot on the street for more than 72 hours the can tow it, > but it usually takes them more than 72 hrs to even get around to checking > whether it's stolen or abandoned. Heck - one of the neighbors even has > roosters, which start crowing at about 3 am! > Patti > North Hollywood (part of Los Angeles) > ******************* > > > On Dec 11, 2007 11:36 AM, David Kao <dtkao0205@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Cambridge (Boston) is another city that basically disallows parking > > of any cars in any streets (very few exceptions), except in front of > > your own property. Been there a couple of times and it was a PITA. > > As a visitor of that city I found I hated that city so bad that I > > am so glad that I will never need to go there again. > > > > David > > > > > > --- -------- < VW4X4@VERIZON.NET> wrote: > > > > > This is a very common regulation, in many townships, etc. I live in > > > one, but its not > > > quit the same. Our law reads, your not allowed to park an RV or > > > commercial > > > vehicle on the street, or in the front (yard) of your home, even on your > > > own property. > > > The side or back of your home is OK. I'm all for it. Otherwise, in > > > this place I live, > > > some people would be parking 100 FT RV's everywhere.... until they > > > get repossessed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Geza Polony wrote: > > > > > > >Folks, > > > > > > > >Have any of you ever dealt with this kind of a problem? My city, > > Oakland, > > > >CA, is very seriously considering a ban on camper parking within the > > city > > > >limits, apparently following the lead of Santa Barbara and other > > places. > > > >This ban would include Vanagon Campmobiles such as the type owned by > > yours > > > >truly. Obviously, I'm concerned. > > > > > > > >Does anyone have experience with this kind of thing? Can cities of this > > size > > > >get away with such ordinances, which would prohibit even non-city > > residents > > > >from parking their RV's, etc., for even a few minutes on city streets? > > > > > > > >The first offense is $250; the second, towing. It would apply even to a > > > > > >Vanagon Weekender without a poptop, as long as it has anything inside > > > >intended for camping (per Calif. vehicle code.) > > > > > > > >If this passes, I can't keep my Westy. Is that unbelievable or what? > > > > > > > >If you have any interest in it, read Chip Johnson's article in the SF > > Chronicle. > > > > > > > >Geza > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > > > > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > >

____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.