Date:         Sat, 8 Dec 2007 10:44:31 -0800
Reply-To:     Anthony Egeln <regnsuzanne@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Anthony Egeln <regnsuzanne@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: wiper blades
In-Reply-To:  <159070990712072100y200fcc30qa3b02a3aa4760af0@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

I know that the Rain-X thread was beaten to death a couple of weeks ago, but I found an old bottle that I bought years ago and it has confused me.  The bottle I have states it is specifically for INSIDE applications.....i.e. bathroom mirrors and inside of windshields.  Is this different from the Rain-X made for the outside of the windshield?  It's particularly confusing since many list members said NOT to use it on the inside of the windshield....this bottle specifically states to use it on the INSIDE of windshields.

Appreciate the value of your experience.

Anthony
'89 Syncro GL (Hidalgo)

robert feller <syncro.carboncow@GMAIL.COM> wrote: I'm with Karl on this one. If you use Rain-X once every 3-4 months correctly
I seldom need any more then intermitant wipers. If you drive  at higher
sppeds are not using Rain-X you are not a SERIOUS driver. I commute about 45
minutes every day to work and sometimes can go the whole distance in a total
down pour w/o even turning on my wipers...

On Dec 7, 2007 11:46 PM, Karl Mullendore  wrote:

> I use 20" and frequent application if Rain-X. Don't need no stinkin'
> wipers most of the time. :-)
>
> Jake de Villiers wrote:
> > The 'con' would be the increased work load on the motor and linkage.
> >
> > I run 18" passenger and 19" driver - its as big as I'm comfortable with
> here
> > in the temperate rainforest where we use the wipers a lot.   :)
>



--
Shawn Feller
Ohio
www.carboncow.com



---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.