Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 2007, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:37:02 -0800
Reply-To:     Michael Elliott <camping.elliott@GMAIL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Michael Elliott <camping.elliott@GMAIL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Multimeter recommendation
In-Reply-To:  <5c80974c0712171941s3ba0bfe5o9ba1fc1962b5f28c@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Second/third that. I make a living with my electronic test equipment and expect it to last for years. But for automotive work 1% accuracy is close enough, the build quality of lower priced instruments is robust enough, and I don't see a reason to spend more. I've used Radio Shack, Sears, Harbor Freight and they are all quite adequate. -- Mike "Rocket J Squirrel" Elliott 71 Type 2: the Wonderbus 84 Westfalia: Mellow Yellow ("The Electrical Banana") 74 Utility Trailer. Ladybug Trailer, Inc., San Juan Capistrano KG6RCR

On 12/17/2007 7:41 PM Sudhir Desai wrote:

> I recommend the $15 analog multimeter from radio shack. :) > It's analog (need I say more?), reliable, cheap. > I've had mine for 8 years, and it is still metering along. > Sudhir > > On Dec 17, 2007 9:21 PM, tom ring <taring@taring.org> wrote: >> All I have to say is, you get what you pay for. A Fluke will last 10 to 1000 >> times longer than a 10 or 20 dollar meter, and will give you an answer you can >> trust. And leads that don't break. And they aren't that expensive when looked >> at from that perspective. >> >> How many here would buy a cheap torque wrench because a good one is too >> expensive? >> >> I just now found a buy-it-now Fluke 77 model II for 59 bucks on ebay. That is >> a good meter. And it looks beat up, but it's only the protective surround >> cover that's beat up. Others that look nicer are more, and other models can be >> more. As I said before, you get what you pay for, but Flukes are NOT >> expensive. Thinking that an electrical tool is something you can go dirt cheap >> on is the same as going dirt cheap on wrenches and sockets. It may let you >> down when you need it most. >> >> tom >> K0TAR >> >> >> On 17 Dec 2007 at 21:38, Mike wrote: >> >>> Flukes are expensive. I use one for work. But for home/ automotive use, I >>> would have to second the opinion on HF. I recently bought this one on sale >>> for 20 bucks, works great; >>> >>> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/displayitem.taf?Itemnumber=37772 >>> >>> Mike B. >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Paul Guzyk" <paullist@GUZYK.COM> >>> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> >>> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 9:20 PM >>> Subject: Re: Multimeter recommendation >>> >>> >>>> A must have feature IMHO is an audible continuity tester. >>>> >>>> i.e. when you touch both ends of the same wire you here a >>>> beep...really handy for troubleshooting wiring issues and especially >>>> handy for building/repairing wiring harnesses. >>>> >>>> Hearing the beep is way easier than looking at the screen of the meter. >>>> >>>> $10 multimeters at Harbor Freight even have this feature and are fine >>>> for general automotive work. >>>> >>>> - >>>> >>>> >>>>> Sears sells some digital Fluke meters, as well as Craftsman branded. >>>>> >>>>> Honestly, for a car 90% of what you will ever do is checking >>>>> continuity or testing for 12V. You don't need an expensive precision >>>>> meter to do that. Look for one with long leads that can be handy. >>>>> >>>>> If you need a more general purpose meter, I agree Fluke has a very >>>>> good reputation. >> >> >> ----------------------------------------- >> Tom Ring K0TAR, ex-WA2PHW EN34hx >> 85 Westphalia GL Albert >> 96 Jetta GL The Intimidator >> taring@taring.org >> >> What happens if a big asteroid hits the Earth? Judging from realistic >> simulations >> involving a sledge hammer and a common laboratory frog, we can assume it will >> be pretty bad. >> - Dave Barry >> ----------------------------------------- >>


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.