On Dec 23, 2007 12:03 PM, Jim Akiba <syncrolist@bostig.com> wrote: > If you are asking which air metering system type is better.. both map > based and maf based have their pros/cons... but generally speaking MAF > systems are more accurate, and map usually considered easier to setup > and tune.. but I don't really find that the case. > Ya, I figured as much. Of course then the question is whether the relatively aged contraption that is the Wasserboxer-Digifant stands to gain much by the extra significant digits you get from a MAF sensor. I was just curious whether the job of adapting a MAP reading to the Digifant is easier or harder than the MAF. A MAP sensor sure would be easier to attach on the mechanical side, and a barometric sensor is certainly cheap. -- John Bange '90 Vanagon - "Geldsauger" |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.