Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2008, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:54:15 +1300
Reply-To:     Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Andrew Grebneff <andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ>
Subject:      Re: Driving a splittie...  NVC
In-Reply-To:  <477C5CEB.5060105@gwtc.net>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed

>One of my favorite driving activities when I owned my 1966 SO-42 camper >was to break loose the rear end as part of making left hand turns. I >didn't like the feeling when I broke it loose in a right hand turn. I >felt too exposed... > >Jeff Olson >Martin, SD > >craig cowan wrote: >>< However, i did not see it on the road, and >>only drove it about 25feet into a garage. Based on that though, they do seem >>to drive pretty nice

I had a 57 panelvan as my first car. Lacking a front swaybar, it suffered extreme oversteer on tight bends taken fast with no load in back. Much of NZ is made up of tight twisty roads... or was, until they began to "improve" the roads... now falling asleep is becoming a killer. Apparently it looked pretty spectacular from behind. With a load in the back it handled very well, with no hint of over or understeer (neutral). I drove it really hard. Wish I'd known about swaybars at the time... though back then a wrecker would've charged an arm & a leg for one. Radials made all the difference... it had crossplies when I bought it. Crossplies should have been illegal decades ago; they are outright dangerous (and I include repro tires for veteran cars here... these should be radial). Went very well after I put a single-port 1.6 (1.3-based) into it. I wish I still had this van.

Later I had a 66 Kombi. With its stock front swaybar it was pretty neutral under any load. Gearing was too "tall" and performance was definitely well down using the engine from the 57.

My 75 Kombi 1.8 with 1.9 slip-in kit tended to understeer when pushed on sharp bends. If the bend wasn't TOO sharp the van could happily do a Banzai! attack on it, but really tight bends needed caution to avoid plowing nose-first off the road (it wasn't actually as bad as that sounds, but I did get a fright once). I guess the front-end geometry was changed somewhere between 1966 and 1975; the front suspensions are interchangable on all "series 1" Transporters (1950-1979 & Brasilian). It had plenty enough go to be fun to drive at speed on good curvy backroads.

My 84 Caravelle was a pig-understeerer, but from all I am led to believe this is not normal and I hopefully attribute it to the cast-iron anchor it had in the back (3.8 Holden V6). -- Andrew Grebneff Dunedin New Zealand Fossil preparator Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut ‚ Opinions stated are mine, not those of Otago University "There is water at the bottom of the ocean" - Talking Heads


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.