Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 2008, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:41:19 -0800
Reply-To:     Robert Keezer <warmerwagen@YAHOO.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Robert Keezer <warmerwagen@YAHOO.COM>
Subject:      Re: Pointing out the Facts on Vanagon Diesels
In-Reply-To:  <ce5.25eb9151.34bc749e@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Always good to hear from you again, Frank.

I also have to second that anecdotal emotion. My 2 liter ABA inline four now has over 225,000 miles on it . using oil, some power loss, but still doing it's job.

I've toyed with the idea of going to a Diesel again. Would probably work well with my AAP 5-speed gas trans with the 4.57 final.

I missed a chance to get a 1.6 Golf hydraulic in November. I'm thinking of Dieseling the '82 Diesel Westfalia again for long road trips, and using the '87 Jetta for local use. A 1.9 would be nice.

Robert

1982 Westfalia

--- Frank Grunthaner <FrankGRUN@AOL.COM> wrote:

> Good Grief! I just saw this exchange triggered > by Scott and others purloining > a reasonable vehicle with words based on > anecdotal wisdom and I had to reply! > I reproduce some of this so-called wisdom at > the end of this email. Those who > have followed any of my dissertations know the > low regard I have for those > who improve on factory engineering with > anecdotal (several cases ill measured) > redesigns such as reducing engine rpm to > enhance longevity. > > But on to this case. The N/A engine was > extensively tested by VW engineers > during the Vanagon diesel development cycle. > Including more than a million miles > in variable load dynamometer testing, and more > than 250,000 km in the Sahara > desert and the Swedish tundra. This winter and > summer test program stressed > the cooling and lubrication systems as well as > the air handling in dust and ice. > The passenger car version of the 1.6l diesel > was detuned from 53.6 hp @ 4800 > to 49.6 hp @ 4200 rpm for the vanagon version. > This resulted in a torque > peak of 76.0 ft-lbs at 2000 rpm up from the > passenger version's 73 ft-lbs. The > power curve was virtually flat from 3700 to > 4300 rpm. Maximum speed was rated > for the kombi version as 110 km/hr or 68.4 mph. > The Westfalia version was DIN > rated for a max speed of 65.0 mph at half rated > load. The rigorous DIN fuel > economy test with 50% city and 50% urban cycles > gave a rated average of 25.5 mpg > also at half rated load. The vanagon diesel was > rated for pulling a 1200 kg > towed load up a 12% grade without slowing in > 4th gear. Hill climbing ability was > rated at a 24% grade at full load and 30% at > half load. The diesel package > added 100 kg to the overall weight of the > vanagon compared to the air-cooled gas > version. Of that 35 kg went to the front tires, > 65 to the rear. Just > engineering facts. For those who want to see > the data, Alistair has posted the original > technical papers on his website. Along with > extensive info on the vehicle > design, the engineering behind various VW > engines including turbodiesels. I will > send up the translated papers on the various > TDi engines when I complete them. > The link is: > > http://www.members.shaw.ca/ragnarhairybreeks/technical%20articles%202/diesel/D > Vtrans.html > > Now as to my anecdotal experience, I purchased > my Westfalia for factory > delivery and put more than 120,000 miles on the > engine before I changed it out due > to boredom. No engine problems except for the > replacement of glow plugs at > about 65,000 miles. Went through a bundle of > starters though. The fellow who > bought my N/A diesel says he has put more than > 80,000 miles on it without the head > off. Oil consumption is now at 400 miles per > quart. Now, the Westy is/was > equipped with the DZ transmission and I > constantly logged a top speed of 62 mph > on SoCal freeways, 65 down hill and usually 55 > to 60 on long cross-country > grades. I drove the vehicle with a digital > throttle (full off or full on) and > regulated speed with the gear shift and brake. > I crossed the Brenner Pass in > second with a cold bottle of Augustinerbrau and > enjoyed it immensely. The engine > was designed for extensive full throttle > operation at 4200 rpm and I ran it > there as much as possible. In Europe, the USA, > Canada and Mexico. While the engine > was slow it was dead reliable. As was the > refrigerator and my necessary > supply of cold liquid. > > Let's see, unusual maintenance ... well I > religiously drained water from the > water/fuel filter once per month. Changed oil > on my normal schedule (2000 > miles for the first two with paraffin based > diesel truck oils, then every 5000 > with synthetic. Checked coolant every month. > Changed oil filters with each oil > change. Kept the oil level just above add. Oh > yeah, and I never, never, never > lugged that engine. Spin! > > After swapping out the diesel for the 1.8l > digifant RV with the DZ trans > still in place, I cheerfully ran it up to 100 > mph (6500 rpm) and ran across parts > of Texas. Generally I ran on the open freeway > at 85 mph with full A/C on (5700 > rpm) since the vanagon felt better at those > speeds. But those details are all > in various rpm/power/drag/thrust reports in the > vanagon list archives. During > several oil pan pulls as I was experimenting > with windage trays, baffles and > whatnot, I examined the crank journals, the > cylinder sidewalls and piston > sidewalls. I also used the boroscope to examine > top piston surfaces, cylinder > upper sidewalls and the combustion > chamber/valve heads. Never anything other than > clean shiny metal! These speeds are often > referred to as an Italian Tune-up. > But after extensive runs between 5500 and 6500 > rpm, there was no evidence of > carbon build up on the combustion chamber head > surface and a light gray sheen on > the piston tops. Haven't taken the head off > yet, so can't say more. But more > than 85,000 miles on the RV engine under these > conditions and the oil burn > rate is still at 1500 miles per quart. Fine by > me. > > Just my 2 centimes, > > Frank Grunthaner > > In a message dated 1/13/08 7:53:37 PM, > ScottDaniel@turbovans.com writes: > > > > > > Hi, nice to see you addressing the realities > of stock 82 1.6 diesel vanagons > > in the US market. > > > > "Usually' manufacturers are testing out > prototype and pre-production > > vehicles in various conditions and countries > prior to marketing them., Like > > BMW or Mercedes or whomever will have > pre-production models here testing > > them in our worst desert summer heat, or in > Alaska or Sweden testing them in > > extreme cold - all a year or two sometimes, > before actually shipping their > > exact US models here. > > > > One would have to guess that they didn't do > that very much here with 48 hp > > 1.6 NA 82 diesel vanagons. It sure doesn't > seem like it anyway. > > > > There you are -........... There yo There you > are -...........<wbr>....... > > together long term really well if it's run at > 90 % all the time' > > ............ ............<wbr>so true. Then > why sell them in a market whe > > to cast iron block inline sixes and V-8's and > we have wide open roads that > > go on forever in some places ? Not that > smart. > > I tell people stock diesel vanagons are > around town delivery type > > vehicles. Used that way they are FINE . > > > > But, used the way Americans often use cars > and vans, stock they are not > > very well matched to our conditions, and not > able to protect themselves, ( > > the vans and engines ) from being driven > hard. So compared to what Americans > > are used to.......... are used > to..........<wbr>they are delicate. And how > > vw engines..... vw > engines.....<wbr>........namely air-cooled ones > traditi > > vans ( it's *always* lots more stress on a > car engine pushing a van of > > course ) .........and 48 hp 1.6 NA engines > are not really up to the task, > > and often just blow to shreds. ............ > and often just blow to shre > > That's all. > > > > > > > > > > > ************** > Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in > shape. > > http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489 >

____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.